Literature DB >> 8777088

Drug therapy for vertebral fractures in osteoporosis: evidence that decreases in bone turnover and increases in bone mass both determine antifracture efficacy.

B L Riggs1, L J Melton, W M O'Fallon.   

Abstract

The conventional belief is that osteopenia is the major cause of vertebral fractures and that drug therapy must induce a substantial increase in vertebral bone mineral density (BMD) before the vertebral fracture rate (VFR) is decreased. We hypothesized that the increased bone turnover in osteoporosis also is a major cause of vertebral fractures because of its adverse effects on the microarchitecture of the vertebrae and, thus, that normalization of bone turnover by antiresorptive drug therapy will decrease VFR substantially. This hypothesis is supported by our reanalysis of data from previous clinical trials with fluoride and with estrogen therapy in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. As evident from computer-generated three-dimensional graphic plots of data from osteoporotic women treated with placebo, VFR increased as bone turnover increased or as vertebral BMD decreased. Estrogen therapy decreased the bone turnover rate to normal and eliminated the relationship between VFR and bone turnover, whereas the inverse relationship with vertebral BMD persisted. In osteoporotic women treated with fluoride, VFR decreased as vertebral BMD increased, provided that patients with high (toxic) serum fluoride levels were not included in the comparison. Over the range of values in the data set, increased vertebral BMD and decreased bone turnover had approximately equal effects in decreasing VFR. Thus, both formation-stimulating and resorption-inhibiting drugs can substantially decrease VFR but do so by different mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8777088     DOI: 10.1016/8756-3282(95)00502-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  27 in total

Review 1.  Treatment induced changes of bone density and relative risk of vertebral fracture.

Authors:  S Adami; O Viapiana; F Corallo
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 2.  Changing perceptions in osteoporosis.

Authors:  T J Wilkin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-27

3.  The 2002 Canadian bone densitometry recommendations: take-home messages.

Authors:  Aliya A Khan; Jacques P Brown; David L Kendler; William D Leslie; Brian C Lentle; E Michael Lewiecki; Paul D Miller; R Lawrence Nicholson; Wojciech P Olszynski; Nelson B Watts
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-11-12       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Clinical utility of bone markers in the evaluation and follow-up of osteoporotic patients: why are the markers poorly accepted by clinicians?

Authors:  J J Stepan
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 5.  Biochemical markers of bone metabolism in the assessment of osteoporosis: useful or not?

Authors:  M J Seibel
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Receptor 1, Bone Resorption, and Bone Mineral Density in the Year Following Hip Fractures: The Baltimore Hip Studies.

Authors:  Shabnam Salimi; Michelle Shardell; Ram Miller; Ann L Gruber-Baldini; Denise Orwig; Neal Fedarko; Marc C Hochberg; Jack M Guralnik; Jay Magaziner
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  The role of biochemical markers of bone turnover in osteoporosis management in clinical practice.

Authors:  Samuel D Vasikaran; Paul Glendenning; Howard A Morris
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2006-08

Review 8.  Fast and slow bone losers. Relevance to the management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  S Hough
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  Denosumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis: what the clinician needs to know.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 10.  Comparing non-vertebral fracture risk reduction with osteoporosis therapies: looking beneath the surface.

Authors:  A Sebba
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.