Literature DB >> 8777077

Evaluation of the risk of hip fracture.

J A Kanis1, E V McCloskey.   

Abstract

Hip fracture is the most serious complication of osteoporosis and the incidence is rising worldwide. Bone mineral density measurements can be used not only to diagnose osteoporosis at the hip, but also to give prognostic information on the lifetime risk of hip fracture. A number of additional risk factors enhance the ability of density measurements to assess risk. Candidates include markers of bone resorption, prior fragility fractures, hip axis length, and estimates of postural integrity, each of which improve prognostic value independently of bone mineral assessments. Their use in the stratification of risk will help define intervention thresholds for treatments and improve the design of population screening policies, particularly in elderly women in whom the burden of hip fracture is greatest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8777077     DOI: 10.1016/8756-3282(95)00493-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  9 in total

1.  Image resolution and magnification using a cone beam densitometer: optimizing data acquisition for hip morphometric analysis.

Authors:  V Boudousq; D Mariano Goulart; J M Dinten; C Caderas de Kerleau; E Thomas; O Mares; P O Kotzki
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-10-16       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Absolute fracture risk.

Authors:  Chad L Deal
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 3.  Assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Frederik Borgstrom; Chris De Laet; Helena Johansson; Olof Johnell; Bengt Jonsson; Anders Oden; Niklas Zethraeus; Bruce Pfleger; Nikolai Khaltaev
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Vitamin D and analogues in renal bone disease and implications for osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; E V McCloskey; M N Beneton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Comparison of the Male Osteoporosis Risk Estimation Score (MORES) With FRAX in Identifying Men at Risk for Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Alvah R Cass; Angela J Shepherd; Rechelle Asirot; Manju Mahajan; Maimoona Nizami
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  A Randomized Clinical Trial of Aquatic versus Land Exercise to Improve Balance, Function, and Quality of Life in Older Women with Osteoporosis.

Authors:  C M Arnold; A J Busch; C L Schachter; E L Harrison; W P Olszynski
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 1.037

8.  Comparison of logistic and Bayesian classifiers for evaluating the risk of femoral neck fracture in osteoporotic patients.

Authors:  D Testi; A Cappello; L Chiari; M Viceconti; S Gnudi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.079

9.  Investigation of the prevalent fall-related risk factors of fractures in elderly referred to Tehran hospitals.

Authors:  Ali A Jamebozorgi; Azam Kavoosi; Zahra Shafiee; Amir H Kahlaee; Mehdi Raei
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2013-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.