OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of antibodies to hepatitis C virus and serological markers for hepatitis B virus infection in patients with HIV. DESIGN: Cross sectional survey. SETTING: Aquitaine, southwestern France, 1991-94. SUBJECTS: 1935 HIV positive patients seen at least once since June 1991. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence of antibodies to hepatitis C virus were detected by second or third generation enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) and markers for hepatitis B virus detected by ELISA. RESULTS: The prevalence was 42.5% (823) for antibodies to hepatitis C virus, 56.4 (507) for antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen, 6.9% (133) for hepatitis B surface antigen, 30.2% (584) for antibodies to hepatitis B core and surface antigen with no detectable surface antigen, 26.2% (507) for antibodies to core antigen only, and 4.8% (92) for antibodies to surface antigen only. The prevalence of antibodies to hepatitis C virus was 86.1% (726/843) in subjects who had bloodborne HIV infection and 7.3% (66/899) in those with sexually acquired infection. The prevalence of markers for hepatitis B was higher among homosexuals than in the other groups of patients, except for antibodies to surface antigen alone. The relation between markers for hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus was negative among men but positive among women. CONCLUSIONS: The results favour the hypothesis that hepatitis C virus is sexually transmitted much less commonly than either HIV or hepatitis B virus.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of antibodies to hepatitis C virus and serological markers for hepatitis B virus infection in patients with HIV. DESIGN: Cross sectional survey. SETTING: Aquitaine, southwestern France, 1991-94. SUBJECTS: 1935 HIV positive patients seen at least once since June 1991. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence of antibodies to hepatitis C virus were detected by second or third generation enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) and markers for hepatitis B virus detected by ELISA. RESULTS: The prevalence was 42.5% (823) for antibodies to hepatitis C virus, 56.4 (507) for antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen, 6.9% (133) for hepatitis B surface antigen, 30.2% (584) for antibodies to hepatitis B core and surface antigen with no detectable surface antigen, 26.2% (507) for antibodies to core antigen only, and 4.8% (92) for antibodies to surface antigen only. The prevalence of antibodies to hepatitis C virus was 86.1% (726/843) in subjects who had bloodborne HIV infection and 7.3% (66/899) in those with sexually acquired infection. The prevalence of markers for hepatitis B was higher among homosexuals than in the other groups of patients, except for antibodies to surface antigen alone. The relation between markers for hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus was negative among men but positive among women. CONCLUSIONS: The results favour the hypothesis that hepatitis C virus is sexually transmitted much less commonly than either HIV or hepatitis B virus.
Authors: S Kleinman; H Alter; M Busch; P Holland; G Tegtmeier; M Nelles; S Lee; E Page; J Wilber; A Polito Journal: Transfusion Date: 1992 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: G Kuo; Q L Choo; H J Alter; G L Gitnick; A G Redeker; R H Purcell; T Miyamura; J L Dienstag; M J Alter; C E Stevens Journal: Science Date: 1989-04-21 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: E A Santos; C F T Yoshida; V C Rolla; J M Mendes; I F Vieira; J Arabe; S A Gomes Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2003-02-18 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Helen M Chun; Ann M Fieberg; Katherine Huppler Hullsiek; Alan R Lifson; Nancy F Crum-Cianflone; Amy C Weintrob; Anuradha Ganesan; Robert V Barthel; William P Bradley; Brian K Agan; Michael L Landrum Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2010-02-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Sarah M McCabe; Qing Ma; Judianne C Slish; Linda M Catanzaro; Neha Sheth; Robert DiCenzo; Gene D Morse Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2008 Impact factor: 6.447