Literature DB >> 8776157

Proficiency of foot care specialists to place the rearfoot at subtalar neutral.

M R Pierrynowski1, S B Smith, J H Mlynarczyk.   

Abstract

The proficiency of clinicians to place a rearfoot at the subtalar neutral position is important for the treatment of patients with lower extremity dysfunctions, and especially for foot orthosis prescription, fabrication, and management. However, the ability of experienced foot care specialists to perform this task has not been statistically compared with an average capacity. In this study, eight experienced chiropodists and eight untrained physiotherapy students placed six rearfeet at the subtalar neutral position five times. Statistically, the foot care specialists were able to find the subtalar neutral position better than the students (mean 0.00 versus 0.99 degrees, SD 1.84 versus 2.97 degrees, range -5.27 degrees to 4.33 degrees versus -6.25 degrees to 9.27 degrees). This can be interpreted as stating that foot care specialists and untrained students place a rearfoot within +/- 1 degree of the subtalar neutral position 41.3% and 25.0% of the time, respectively. Corresponding values within +/- 2 degrees of the subtalar neutral position are 72.3 degrees and 47.6 degrees, respectively. Alternatively, it can be stated that experienced foot care specialists are within +/- 3.0 degrees of the subtalar neutral position 90% of the time. A corresponding value for the students is +/- 4.9 degrees. These results suggest that although experienced foot care specialists position a rearfoot at the subtalar neutral position better than untrained physiotherapy students, there is room for improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8776157     DOI: 10.7547/87507315-86-5-217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc        ISSN: 1930-8264


  10 in total

1.  An investigation of a reference posture used in determining rearfoot kinematics for both healthy and patellofemoral pain syndrome individuals.

Authors:  Pazit Levinger; Wendy Gilleard
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Classification of the height and flexibility of the medial longitudinal arch of the foot.

Authors:  Mette Kjærgaard Nilsson; Rikke Friis; Maria Skjoldahl Michaelsen; Patrick Abildgaard Jakobsen; Rasmus Oestergaard Nielsen
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Deep posterior compartment strength and foot kinematics in subjects with stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction.

Authors:  Christopher Neville; Adolph S Flemister; Jeff R Houck
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.827

4.  Foot kinematics during a bilateral heel rise test in participants with stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction.

Authors:  Jeff R Houck; Christopher Neville; Josh Tome; A Samuel Flemister
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.751

5.  Ankle and foot kinematics associated with stage II PTTD during stance.

Authors:  Jeff R Houck; Christopher G Neville; Josh Tome; Adolph S Flemister
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.827

6.  Comparison of foot orthoses made by podiatrists, pedorthists and orthotists regarding plantar pressure reduction in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Nick A Guldemond; Pieter Leffers; Nicolaas C Schaper; Antal P Sanders; Fred H M Nieman; Geert H I M Walenkamp
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Challenging the foundations of the clinical model of foot function: further evidence that the root model assessments fail to appropriately classify foot function.

Authors:  Hannah L Jarvis; Christopher J Nester; Peter D Bowden; Richard K Jones
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  SUBTALAR JOINT IN NEUTRAL AND RELAXED POSITIONS FOR EVALUATION OF MEDIAL LONGITUDINAL ARCH.

Authors:  André Setti Persiane; Daiane Magalhães Gomes Negrão; Raone Daltro Paraguassu Alves; Diego Galace DE Freitas; Cláudio Cazarini; Vera Lúcia Dos Santos Alves
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2021 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.513

9.  Arch height change during sit-to-stand: an alternative for the navicular drop test.

Authors:  Thomas G McPoil; Mark W Cornwall; Lynn Medoff; Bill Vicenzino; Kelly Forsberg; Dana Hilz
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 2.303

10.  Reproducibility of and sex differences in common orthopaedic ankle and foot tests in runners.

Authors:  Maarten P van der Worp; Anton de Wijer; J Bart Staal; Maria W G Nijhuis- van der Sanden
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 2.362

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.