Literature DB >> 8775727

Conflicts between managed care organizations and emergency departments in California.

L A Johnson1, R W Derlet.   

Abstract

To control costs, managed care organizations have begun to restrict the use of hospital emergency departments by their enrollees. They are doing this by educating enrollees, providing better access to 24-hour urgent care, denying preauthorizations for care for some patients who do present to emergency departments, and retrospectively denying payment for certain patients who use emergency services. Changing traditional use of emergency departments has resulted in conflicts between managed care organizations and these departments. Because federal law mandates access to emergency care for all persons, disagreements occur over the precise definition of an emergency medical condition. In addition, conflicts occur over the scope and payment for the medical screening examination required by federal law of persons presenting to an emergency department. Finally, issues arise related to the safety of patients who present to emergency departments and request care but are denied care because the managed care organization does not authorize the visit. Recent legislation in California has attempted to reconcile differences between managed care practices and federal and state laws; however, areas of continued conflict need to be resolved to prevent possible adverse consequences for patients actually needing emergency care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8775727      PMCID: PMC1303385     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  14 in total

1.  National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1992 emergency department summary.

Authors:  L F McCaig
Journal:  Adv Data       Date:  1994-03-02

2.  Health care 1994: top ten trends for the era of health reform.

Authors:  R C Coile
Journal:  Hosp Strategy Rep       Date:  1994-01

3.  The etiology of medical gridlock: causes of emergency department overcrowding in New York City.

Authors:  E J Gallagher; S G Lynn
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.484

4.  Nonurgent emergency department visits. Meeting an unmet need.

Authors:  A L Kellermann
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994 Jun 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The ED and triage of nonurgent patients.

Authors:  R A Lowe; A B Bindman
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  Nonurgent emergency department visits--whose definition?

Authors:  T A Mitchell
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  Inappropriate emergency department visits.

Authors:  D P Buesching; A Jablonowski; E Vesta; W Dilts; C Runge; J Lund; R Porter
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 5.721

8.  Refusing care to emergency department of patients: evaluation of published triage guidelines.

Authors:  R A Lowe; A B Bindman; S K Ulrich; G Norman; T A Scaletta; D Keane; D Washington; K Grumbach
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.721

9.  Obstacles predicting lack of a regular provider and delays in seeking care for patients at an urban public hospital.

Authors:  K J Rask; M V Williams; R M Parker; S E McNagny
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994 Jun 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Prospective identification and triage of nonemergency patients out of an emergency department: a 5-year study.

Authors:  R W Derlet; D Kinser; L Ray; B Hamilton; J McKenzie
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 5.721

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.