Expression of Ep-CAM in cervical squamous epithelia correlates with an increased proliferation and the disappearance of markers for terminal differentiation.

Ep-CAM, an epithelial adhesion molecule, is absent in normal squamous epithelia but can be detected in some squamous carcinomas. Using a panel of monoclonal antibodies to keratinocyte differentiation and proliferation markers, we investigated the association of EP-CAM expression with differentiation-related and/or neoplastic changes in cervical epithelium. Normal endocervical glandular epithelium (Both columnar and reserve cells) appeared strongly positive for EP-CAM, whereas ectocervical squamous epithelial cells did not express this molecule. Expression of Ep-CAM (in basal cells) was sometimes observed in morphologically normal ectocervical tissue but only in areas bordering cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) lesions. At the early stages of neoplasia the expression of Ep-CAM was regularly present in squamous epithelium, in general consistent with the areas of atypical, undifferentiated cells. Thus, in CIN grades I and II, the basal/suprabasal layers of the epithelia were positive, whereas in CIN grade III lesions, up to 100% of the cells over the whole thickness of the epithelium sometimes excluding the very upper layers, expressed Ep-CAM. A clear increase, not only in number of positive cells but also in levels of Ep-CAM expression (intensity) was observed during progression from CIN I to CIN III. Expression of Ep-CAM in ectocervical lesions did not coincide with a reappearance of the simple epithelium cytokeratins (CK8 and CK18). On the other hand, expression of Ep-CAM in atypical cells of CIN lesions correlated with the disappearance of CK13, which normally marks cells undergoing squamous differentiation. As was shown with Ki-67, a marker for proliferating cell populations, the areas of Ep-CAM expression were also the areas of enhanced proliferation. Cells expressing Ep-CAM did not express involucrin, a marker for cells committed to terminal differentiation. In the majority of both squamous and adenocarcinomas of the cervix a strong expression of Ep-CAM was observed, although some decrease in the expression (both the intensity and the number of positive cells), as compared with CIN III lesions, was observed in the areas of squamous differentiation. This study demonstrates that the expression of Ep-CAM in cervical squamous epithelium is associated with abnormal proliferation of cell populations that are not committed to terminal differentiation.