Literature DB >> 8773968

Cumulative experience with 1,273 peripherally inserted central catheters at a single institution.

J F Cardella1, K Cardella, N Bacci, P S Fox, J H Post.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare bedside insertion of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) by specially-trained nurses with insertion by cardiovascular and interventional radiologists.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nurses performed 327 bedside insertions with a palpatory, through-the-needle technique in 301 patients. Radiologists performed 542 insertions with a venographic-fluoroscopic direct puncture and sheath technique in 354 patients.
RESULTS: A total of 869 PICCs were inserted in 655 patients. Compared with the first interval of the study (reported previously), bedside technical success improved from 74% to 82.6%, technical success decreased from 98.6% to 98.2%, and the service interval for a given PICC decreased from 72.7 to 28.1 days (because PICCs were used instead of peripheral intravenous lines). Rates of thrombophlebitis and infection remained low. Device failure continued to be a problem. About 25% of patients needed insertion of more than one PICC to complete therapy.
CONCLUSION: Bedside insertion by specially trained nurses is less costly than insertion by radiologists, but radiologists are needed for difficult initial insertions, PICC salvage, and PICC exchange.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8773968     DOI: 10.1016/s1051-0443(96)70724-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  7 in total

1.  Long-term use of peripherally inserted central venous catheters for cancer chemotherapy in children.

Authors:  Akinobu Matsuzaki; Aiko Suminoe; Yuhki Koga; Miho Hatano; Sagano Hattori; Toshiro Hara
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  An evaluation of peripherally inserted central venous catheters for children with cancer requiring long-term venous access.

Authors:  Naoki Hatakeyama; Tsukasa Hori; Masaki Yamamoto; Nobuo Mizue; Natsuko Inazawa; Keita Igarashi; Hiroyuki Tsutsumi; Nobuhiro Suzuki
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 3.  Peripherally inserted central venous catheters are not superior to central venous catheters in the acute care of surgical patients on the ward.

Authors:  Simon Turcotte; Serge Dubé; Gilles Beauchamp
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Peripherally inserted central venous catheters for autologous blood progenitor cell transplantation in patients with haematological malignancies.

Authors:  C Harter; T Ostendorf; A Bach; G Egerer; H Goldschmidt; A D Ho
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-09-20       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Peripherally inserted central catheter bloodstream infection surveillance rates in an acute care setting in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Jaffar A Al-Tawfiq; Mahmoud S Abed; Ziad A Memish
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.526

6.  Simplified equation for determining proper depth of peripherally inserted central catheter in relation to anatomical landmarks.

Authors:  Sang-Soo Kang; Yang-Sik Shin; Seon-Yi Lee; Hyunzu Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-04-24

7.  Intracavitary electrocardiogram guidance for placement of peripherally inserted central catheters in premature infants.

Authors:  Lijuan Yang; Xu Bing; Luo Song; Chen Na; Dai Minghong; Liu Annuo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.