Literature DB >> 8772424

Time of initiation and site of action of the mouse chromosome 11 imprinting effects.

B M Cattanach1, C V Beechey, C Rasberry, J Jones, D Papworth.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that mice with paternal disomy for chromosome 11 are consistently larger at birth than their normal sibs, whereas mice with the maternal disomy are consistently smaller. An imprinting effect with monoallelic expression of some gene/s affecting growth was indicated. Here we show that the size differences become established prior to birth and are only maintained subsequently, indicating that the gene repression is limited to prenatal development. Fetal analysis was limited to 12.5-17.5 days post coitum. However by extrapolating the data backwards it could be calculated that both the maternal and paternal size effects might commence as early as 7 days post coitum, although possibly slightly later. It may be deduced that initiation of expression of the gene/s responsible may occur at about this time in development. The two disomy growth rates were mirror-images of each other, suggesting that expressed gene dosage is the underlying cause. Differential growth of the placentas of the two disomies was also found, and extrapolation of these data backwards suggested that the placental size differences were initiated later in development than those for the fetuses. The differential placental growth of the maternal and paternal disomies may therefore have developed independently or emerged as a consequence of the differential fetal growth. In either event it would seem that the expression of the responsible gene occurs in the fetus itself to cause the anomalies of growth. The data therefore provide information on the temporal and tissue specificity of the gene/s responsible for the chromosome 11 imprinting effects. Possible candidate genes are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8772424     DOI: 10.1017/s0016672300033863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Res        ISSN: 0016-6723            Impact factor:   1.588


  8 in total

Review 1.  Grb10 and Grb14: enigmatic regulators of insulin action--and more?

Authors:  Lowenna J Holt; Kenneth Siddle
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  The mouse chromosome 7 distal imprinting domain maps to G-bands F4/F5.

Authors:  C V Beechey; S T Ball; K M Townsend; J Jones
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.957

3.  Identification of the Meg1/Grb10 imprinted gene on mouse proximal chromosome 11, a candidate for the Silver-Russell syndrome gene.

Authors:  N Miyoshi; Y Kuroiwa; T Kohda; H Shitara; H Yonekawa; T Kawabe; H Hasegawa; S C Barton; M A Surani; T Kaneko-Ishino; F Ishino
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Nedd4 controls animal growth by regulating IGF-1 signaling.

Authors:  Xiao R Cao; Nancy L Lill; Natasha Boase; Peijun P Shi; David R Croucher; Hongbo Shan; Jing Qu; Eileen M Sweezer; Trenton Place; Patricia A Kirby; Roger J Daly; Sharad Kumar; Baoli Yang
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 8.192

5.  Imprinted methylation profiles for proximal mouse chromosomes 11 and 7 as revealed by methylation-sensitive representational difference analysis.

Authors:  David Monk; Rachel Smith; Philippe Arnaud; Michael A Preece; Philip Stanier; Colin V Beechey; Jo Peters; Gavin Kelsey; Gudrun E Moore
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.957

6.  Interactions between imprinting effects in the mouse.

Authors:  Bruce M Cattanach; Colin V Beechey; Josephine Peters
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  The role of genomic imprinting in biology and disease: an expanding view.

Authors:  Jo Peters
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Disruption of the imprinted Grb10 gene leads to disproportionate overgrowth by an Igf2-independent mechanism.

Authors:  Marika Charalambous; Florentia M Smith; William R Bennett; Tracey E Crew; Francesca Mackenzie; Andrew Ward
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 12.779

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.