Literature DB >> 8771150

Fine needle sampling without aspiration.

M P Kumarasinghe1, A H Sheriffdeen.   

Abstract

Four hundred and ten thyroid nodules, 127 breast lumps and 43 lymph nodes were sampled and analyzed to compare the classical aspiration (ASP) technique with the non aspiration needle jab (NASP) technique. The adequacy of cellularity, significant blood staining and the discomfort felt by the patient were assessed and statistically analyzed. The non aspiration technique was found to be superior to the classical aspiration technique for fine needle sampling of thyroid in all aspects. However, for breast lesions, while the discomfort felt and the staining with blood was less with the non aspiration technique, the overall cellular yield was unsatisfactory. The adequacy of cellular yield was, however, comparable for malignant breast lesions with either technique. For lymph node sampling, both techniques showed equivalent results with regard to the cellularity but, the NASP technique was superior in other aspects. Although the overall patient discomfort and blood staining was significantly less, the adequacy of the cellularity was influenced by the site and the nature of the lesion. Thus it can be concluded that the technique needs to be selected depending on the anatomic site, the clinical situation, the personal experience and the preference of the operator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8771150     DOI: 10.1080/00313029500169243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathology        ISSN: 0031-3025            Impact factor:   5.306


  2 in total

1.  Combination of aspiration and non-aspiration fine needle biopsy for cytological diagnosis of thyroid nodules.

Authors:  Zahra Kashi; Zhila Torabizadeh; Ozra Akha; Ali Yaseri; Mohammad Hosein Shahidi; Marjan Mokhtare
Journal:  Caspian J Intern Med       Date:  2011

2.  Survey of current approaches to non-diagnostic fine-needle aspiration from solid thyroid nodules.

Authors:  Juan P Brito; M Regina Castro; Diana S Dean; Vahab Fatourechi; Marius Stan
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.633

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.