Literature DB >> 8770379

Detection, discrimination and sensation of visceral stimuli.

R Hölzl1, L P Erasmus, A Möltner.   

Abstract

Afferent visceral signals serve mostly regulatory functions and produce vague, diffuse body sensations, which are not well reflected in experimental paradigms requiring distinct and localized 'visceral perceptions'. A series of studies is summarized which compared behavioral discrimination of gastrointestinal distension stimuli with subjective sensation ratings in relation to basic perceptual operations such as detection, localization, graduation, and identification. Results showed that detection of gastrointestinal stimuli is possible without the subject's awareness (discrimination without reportable sensation). This process does not depend on stimulus intensity at volumes below those sufficient for subjective sensation. The latter is necessary, however, for intensity discrimination (graduation). Contrary to exteroception (e.g. vision), conscious subjective sensation is also required for stimulus localization. These differences in processing could not be explained by simple differences in response criteria. An intensity-dependent two-process model of gastrointestinal interoception is derived which differs from standard models of somatosensory information processing.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8770379     DOI: 10.1016/0301-0511(95)05155-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  23 in total

1.  Somatovisceral interactions in visceral perception: abdominal masking of colonic stimuli.

Authors:  R Hölzl; A Möltner; C W Neidig
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  1999 Oct-Dec

Review 2.  Interoceptive dysfunction: toward an integrated framework for understanding somatic and affective disturbance in depression.

Authors:  Christopher Harshaw
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Interoceptive awareness in experienced meditators.

Authors:  Sahib S Khalsa; David Rudrauf; Antonio R Damasio; Richard J Davidson; Antoine Lutz; Daniel Tranel
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Somatovisceral interactions in visceral perception: abdominal masking of colonic stimuli.

Authors:  R Hölzl; A Möltner; C W Neidig
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  1998 Jul-Sep

5.  A multidimensional and multi-feature framework for cardiac interoception.

Authors:  Sol Fittipaldi; Sofía Abrevaya; Alethia de la Fuente; Guido Orlando Pascariello; Eugenia Hesse; Agustina Birba; Paula Salamone; Malin Hildebrandt; Sofía Alarco Martí; Ricardo Marcos Pautassi; David Huepe; Miquel Martorell Martorell; Adrián Yoris; María Roca; Adolfo M García; Lucas Sedeño; Agustín Ibáñez
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-02-23       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Heartbeat sensitivity in adults with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Simon Rietveld; Petra A Karsdorp; Barbara J M Mulder
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2004

7.  Colonic sensitivity in irritable bowel syndrome and normal subjects according to their hemispheric preference and cognitive style.

Authors:  J Fent; L Balázs; G Buzás; L P Erasmus; R Hölzl; A Kovács; J Weisz; G Adám
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  1999 Jan-Mar

Review 8.  Interoception and drug addiction.

Authors:  Martin P Paulus; Jennifer L Stewart
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 5.250

9.  Bolus isoproterenol infusions provide a reliable method for assessing interoceptive awareness.

Authors:  S S Khalsa; D Rudrauf; C Sandesara; B Olshansky; D Tranel
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 10.  Human drug discrimination: A primer and methodological review.

Authors:  B Levi Bolin; Joseph L Alcorn; Anna R Reynolds; Joshua A Lile; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.