BACKGROUND: Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is a new non-invasive imaging modality which combines two-dimensional echocardiography with cardiovascular stress induced by dobutamine infusion. Its use in patients with suspected or documented coronary artery disease (CAD) is currently under extensive investigation. AIMS: To illustrate the clinical utility, safety and diagnostic value of DSE. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-seven consecutive patients referred for DSE were studied. Eighty-four patients also underwent coronary angiography. RESULTS: Eleven patients (8%) did not undergo DSE because of poor image quality. Of the remaining 126 patients, 110 (87%) achieved their target heart rate or reached a pre-determined end point during DSE. Eight patients (6%) developed non-cardiac side effects during DSE, none of which required premature termination of the procedure. Cardiac arrhythmias were documented in 15 patients (12%) but only one required intervention. In 84 patients who underwent coronary angiography, DSE showed a sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 83%, respectively, in detecting the presence of, and 75% and 75%, respectively, in localising significant CAD. In 35 patients who underwent DSE after uncomplicated myocardial infarction, the positive and negative predictive values for cardiac events following infarction in a six-month followup period were 74% and 62%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DSE is a well tolerated, safe and useful test in detecting and localising significant CAD. It can also provide useful post-infarctional prognostic information.
BACKGROUND:Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is a new non-invasive imaging modality which combines two-dimensional echocardiography with cardiovascular stress induced by dobutamine infusion. Its use in patients with suspected or documented coronary artery disease (CAD) is currently under extensive investigation. AIMS: To illustrate the clinical utility, safety and diagnostic value of DSE. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-seven consecutive patients referred for DSE were studied. Eighty-four patients also underwent coronary angiography. RESULTS: Eleven patients (8%) did not undergo DSE because of poor image quality. Of the remaining 126 patients, 110 (87%) achieved their target heart rate or reached a pre-determined end point during DSE. Eight patients (6%) developed non-cardiac side effects during DSE, none of which required premature termination of the procedure. Cardiac arrhythmias were documented in 15 patients (12%) but only one required intervention. In 84 patients who underwent coronary angiography, DSE showed a sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 83%, respectively, in detecting the presence of, and 75% and 75%, respectively, in localising significant CAD. In 35 patients who underwent DSE after uncomplicated myocardial infarction, the positive and negative predictive values for cardiac events following infarction in a six-month followup period were 74% and 62%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DSE is a well tolerated, safe and useful test in detecting and localising significant CAD. It can also provide useful post-infarctional prognostic information.
Authors: Yoshinori Noguchi; Shizuko Nagata-Kobayashi; James E Stahl; John B Wong Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2005 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 2.357