Literature DB >> 8769676

Soft and hard tissue response to endosseous dental implants.

M A Listgarten1.   

Abstract

The last two decades have seen a remarkable growth in the development of dental implants and their incorporation into the practice of dentistry. This turn of events was made possible by an improved understanding of biological response of living tissues to implants as well as clinical trials that validated the long-term success of these implants. Despite major structural differences between teeth and implants, such as the absence of a periodontal ligament around implants, the latter appear to provide a reliable functional replacement for their natural counterparts. This review briefly summarizes the major structural differences of the interfacial region of teeth and dental implants and their supporting tissues. It focuses on our current understanding of the soft and hard tissue responses to submerged and nonsubmerged root-form dental implants. The influence of a number of factors that affect the tissue response is reviewed, including biomaterials, implant design, surgical technique, and the local microbiota. Our recently acquired ability to modulate wound healing with guided tissue regeneration and growth factors will undoubtedly play an important role in the future utilization and success rates of dental implants.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8769676     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199606)245:2<410::AID-AR20>3.0.CO;2-R

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Rec        ISSN: 0003-276X


  8 in total

1.  Clinician- and patient-reported long-term evaluation of screw- and cement-retained implant restorations: a 5-year prospective study.

Authors:  Sami Sherif; Srinivas M Susarla; Jae-Woong Hwang; Hans-Peter Weber; Robert F Wright
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Immediate non-submerged implants with laser-microtextured collar placed in the inter-radicular septum of mandibular molar extraction sockets associated to GBR: Results at 3-year.

Authors:  Renzo Guarnieri; Dario Di Nardo; Gianni Di Giorgio; Gabriele Miccoli; Luca Testarelli
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-04-01

3.  The basic science of peri-implant bone healing.

Authors:  Paul Rt Kuzyk; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.251

4.  A comparison of epithelial cells, fibroblasts, and osteoblasts in dental implant titanium topographies.

Authors:  Fu-Yuan Teng; Chia-Ling Ko; Hsien-Nan Kuo; Jin-Jia Hu; Jia-Horng Lin; Ching-Wen Lou; Chun-Cheng Hung; Yin-Lai Wang; Cheng-Yi Cheng; Wen-Cheng Chen
Journal:  Bioinorg Chem Appl       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 7.778

5.  Effect of laser-dimpled titanium surfaces on attachment of epithelial-like cells and fibroblasts.

Authors:  Dong-Woon Lee; Jae-Gu Kim; Meyoung-Kon Kim; Sahar Ansari; Alireza Moshaverinia; Seong-Ho Choi; Jae-Jun Ryu
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Effect of alendronate on bone remodeling around implant in the rat.

Authors:  Ran Park; Jee-Hwan Kim; Hyunmin Choi; Young-Bum Park; Han-Sung Jung; Hong-Seok Moon
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  Accelerated and enhanced osteointegration of MAO-treated implants: histological and histomorphometric evaluation in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Xin Li; Haiyang Xu; Baodong Zhao; Shuai Jiang
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 6.344

8.  Bony spicules trapped in peri-implant soft tissue: a common unrecognized finding.

Authors:  Teeratida Sampatanukul; Pravej Serichetaphongse; Pichet Sampatanukul; Atiphan Pimkhaokham
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2017-09-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.