Literature DB >> 8769587

Final outcome results of the Multicenter Isradipine Diuretic Atherosclerosis Study (MIDAS). A randomized controlled trial.

N O Borhani1, M Mercuri, P A Borhani, V M Buckalew, M Canossa-Terris, A A Carr, T Kappagoda, M V Rocco, H W Schnaper, J R Sowers, M G Bond.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the rate of progression of mean maximum intimal-medial thickness (IMT) in carotid arteries, using quantitative B-mode ultrasound imaging, during antihypertensive therapy with isradipine vs hydrochlorothiazide.
DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, positive-controlled trial.
SETTING: Nine medical center clinics. POPULATION: A total of 883 patients with baseline mean +/- SD systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP, respectively) of 149.7 +/- 16.6 and 96.5 +/- 5.1 mm Hg, age of 58.5 +/- 8.5 years, and maximum IMT of 1.17 +/- 0.20 mm.
INTERVENTIONS: Twice daily doses of isradipine (2.5-5.0 mg) or hydrochlorothiazide (12.5-25 mg). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE (PRIMARY END POINT): Rate of progression of mean maximum IMT in 12 carotid focal points over 3 years.
RESULTS: There was no difference in the rate of progression of mean maximum IMT between isradipine and hydrochlorothiazide over 3 years (P=.68). There was a higher incidence of major vascular events (eg, myocardial infarction, stroke, congestive heart failure, angina, and sudden death) in isradipine (n=25; 5.65%) vs hydrochlorothiazide (n=14; 3.17%) (P=.07), and a significant increase in nonmajor vascular events and procedures (eg, transient ischemic attack, dysrhythmia, aortic valve replacement, and femoral popliteal bypass graft) in isradipine (n=40; 9.05%) vs hydrochlorothiazide (n=23; 5.22%) (P=.02). At 6 months, mean DBP decreased by 13.0 mm Hg in both groups, and mean SBP decreased by 19.5 mm Hg in hydrochlorothiazide and 16.0 mm Hg in isradipine (P=.002); the difference in SBP between the 2 groups persisted throughout the study but did not explain the increased incidence of vascular events in patients treated with isradipine.
CONCLUSION: The rate of progression of mean maximum IMT in carotid arteries, the surrogate end point in this study, did not differ between the 2 treatment groups. The increased incidence of vascular events in patients receiving isradipine compared with hydrochlorothiazide is of concern and should be studied further.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8769587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  66 in total

1.  Inferiority of calcium channel blockers to cheaper drugs. News item was inaccurate on at least two counts.

Authors:  N M Kaplan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-17

Review 2.  Hypertension and diabetic retinopathy--what's the story?

Authors:  J T Gillow; J M Gibson; P M Dodson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 3.  Systematic review of antihypertensive therapies: does the evidence assist in choosing a first-line drug?

Authors:  J M Wright; C H Lee; G K Chambers
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-07-13       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  The antiatherogenic effects of antihypertensive treatment: trials completed and ongoing.

Authors:  A Zanchetti
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 5.  Prospectively designed overviews of recent trials comparing antihypertensive regimens based on different drug classes.

Authors:  N Chapman; B Neal
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.369

6.  Health outcomes associated with calcium antagonists.

Authors:  R B Thakkar; S Oparil
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.369

7.  Influence of hypertension and smoking as the single vascular risk factors on the intima-media thickness.

Authors:  A Csányi; A Egervári; Z Nagy
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 8.  Antiarrhythmic therapies for the prevention of sudden cardiac death.

Authors:  F A McAlister; K K Teo
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Antihypertensive therapy in the prevention of stroke: what, when and for whom?

Authors:  M D Fotherby; B Panayiotou
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  Current treatment of patients with hypertension: therapeutic implications of INSIGHT.

Authors:  Stefano Taddei; Lorenzo Ghiadoni; Antonio Salvetti
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.