Literature DB >> 876814

Auditory-visual interactions and the correspondence between perceived auditory space and perceived visual space.

D Regan, H Spekreijse.   

Abstract

Changes in the physical rate of a clicking or fluttering sound caused changes in the rate at which a simultaneously viewed light appears to flicker, even though the physical flicker rate remains constant. Perceived flicker rate increases in response to a rate of change of flicker frequency, and this auditory 'driving' does not depend on whether the auditory and visual sources have the same location. Visual evoked potentials do not correlate with 'driving'. Thus, the effect of auditory flutter upon perceived visual frequency is not due to the properties of Morrell-type bimodal neurons, nor does it reflect the activities of neurons responsible for maintaining correspondence between perceived auditory space and perceived visual space. The effect is possibly due to modification of a subjective criterion rather than, as previously suggested, to the entrainment or time-locking of physiological signals in the visual pathway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 876814     DOI: 10.1068/p060133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  6 in total

1.  Phenomenology of the sound-induced flash illusion.

Authors:  Richard V Abadi; Jonathan S Murphy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Evoked brain responses to auditory and visual stimuli of equal subjective magnitude.

Authors:  J K Walsh
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1979-11

3.  Social vision: sustained perceptual enhancement of affective facial cues in social anxiety.

Authors:  Lisa M McTeague; Joshua R Shumen; Matthias J Wieser; Peter J Lang; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Neural Basis of the Sound-Symbolic Crossmodal Correspondence Between Auditory Pseudowords and Visual Shapes.

Authors:  Kelly McCormick; Simon Lacey; Randall Stilla; Lynne C Nygaard; K Sathian
Journal:  Multisens Res       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 2.352

5.  Audiovisual temporal order judgments.

Authors:  Massimiliano Zampini; David I Shore; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Temporal causal inference with stochastic audiovisual sequences.

Authors:  Shannon M Locke; Michael S Landy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.