Literature DB >> 8768073

Homologous genetic recombination in Xenopus: mechanism and implications for gene manipulation.

D Carroll1.   

Abstract

Appropriately designed DNA substrates undergo very efficient homologous recombination after injection into the nuclei of Xenopus laevis oocytes. The requirements for this process are that the substrate be linear, that it have direct repeats to support recombination, and that these repeats be at or very near the molecular ends. Taking advantage of direct nuclear injection, the large amounts of DNA processed in a single oocyte, and the accessibility of recombination intermediates, we were able to analyze the mechanism of recombination in detail. Molecular ends are resected by a 5'-->3' exonuclease activity. When complementary sequences are exposed from two ends, they anneal. Continued 5'-->3' degradation removes the redundant strands; the 3' ends pair with their complements and can be extended by DNA polymerase to fill any gap left by the exonuclease. Joining of strands by DNA ligase completes the process. This mechanism is nonconservative, in that only one of the two original repeats is retained, and it has been dubbed single-strand annealing, or SSA. The capability for SSA accumulates during the later phases of oogenesis and persists into the egg. This pattern suggests that, like many activities of full-grown oocytes, SSA is stored for use during embryogenesis. The same or a very similar mechanism is prevalent in many other species, including bacteria, yeast, plants, and mammals, where it often provides the predominant mode of recombination of extrachromosomal DNA. Lessons learned about SSA are applicable to methods of gene manipulation. It is plausible that SSA has a normal function in the repair of double-strand breaks, but proof of this awaits identification of genes and enzymes uniquely involved in this style of recombination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8768073     DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6603(08)60361-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol        ISSN: 0079-6603


  12 in total

Review 1.  Chimeric restriction enzymes: what is next?

Authors:  S Chandrasegaran; J Smith
Journal:  Biol Chem       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.915

2.  Stimulation of homologous recombination through targeted cleavage by chimeric nucleases.

Authors:  M Bibikova; D Carroll; D J Segal; J K Trautman; J Smith; Y G Kim; S Chandrasegaran
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Processing of targeted psoralen cross-links in Xenopus oocytes.

Authors:  D J Segal; A F Faruqi; P M Glazer; D Carroll
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  A novel cell-free system reveals a mechanism of circular DNA formation from tandem repeats.

Authors:  S Cohen; M Mechali
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Efficient gene targeting in Drosophila with zinc-finger nucleases.

Authors:  Kelly Beumer; Gargi Bhattacharyya; Marina Bibikova; Jonathan K Trautman; Dana Carroll
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Mouse RAD54 affects DNA double-strand break repair and sister chromatid exchange.

Authors:  M L Dronkert; H B Beverloo; R D Johnson; J H Hoeijmakers; M Jasin; R Kanaar
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Targeted mutagenesis by homologous recombination in D. melanogaster.

Authors:  Yikang S Rong; Simon W Titen; Heng B Xie; Mary M Golic; Michael Bastiani; Pradip Bandyopadhyay; Baldomero M Olivera; Michael Brodsky; Gerald M Rubin; Kent G Golic
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Analysis of the Xenopus Werner syndrome protein in DNA double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Hong Yan; Jill McCane; Thomas Toczylowski; Chinyi Chen
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  A sensitive and rapid assay for homologous recombination in mosquito cells: impact of vector topology and implications for gene targeting.

Authors:  P Eggleston; Y Zhao
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2001-12-17       Impact factor: 2.797

10.  Group II intron-based gene targeting reactions in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Marta Mastroianni; Kazuo Watanabe; Travis B White; Fanglei Zhuang; Jamie Vernon; Manabu Matsuura; John Wallingford; Alan M Lambowitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.