Literature DB >> 8767947

[Agee endoscopic decompression of the median nerve: prospective study with comparison to open decompression].

V R Benedetti1, G Sennwald.   

Abstract

This prospective randomized study consists of 45 patients, i.e., 33 women and 12 men with an average age of 52.7 years. The following parameters were evaluated: rate of complications, recovery of pinch and strength of grip, radiological widening of the transverse carpal arch, postoperative morbidity, particularly the time of return to work, and to activities of daily living. Compared with open decompression, the group of endoscopic decompression needs significantly less time to get back to work (one third; p = 0.003). This seems to be related to a significantly faster restoration of strength of grip (p = 0.f12) after endoscopic decompression of the median nerve. Pinch grip improves faster in the group of endoscopic decompression as well, however, not significantly, compared with open decompression. No significant difference between the two techniques has been detected in the radiological widening of the transverse carpal arch.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8767947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir        ISSN: 0722-1819            Impact factor:   1.018


  6 in total

Review 1.  Analysis of reporting return to work in studies comparing open with endoscopic carpal tunnel release: A review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Olubimpe Ayeni; Achilleas Thoma; Ted Haines; Sheila Sprague
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2005

2.  Application of the CONSORT statement to randomized controlled trials comparing endoscopic and open carpal tunnel release.

Authors:  Achilleas Thoma; Roderick T Chew; Sheila Sprague; Karen Veltri
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2006

3.  A cost-utility analysis of open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release.

Authors:  Achilleas Thoma; Vanessa H Wong; Sheila Sprague; Eric Duku
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2006

Review 4.  Carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Nigel L Ashworth
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2010-03-23

Review 5.  Surgical treatment options for carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  R J P M Scholten; A Mink van der Molen; B M J Uitdehaag; L M Bouter; H C W de Vet
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17

Review 6.  Endoscopic and Open Release Similarly Safe for the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Haris S Vasiliadis; Adriani Nikolakopoulou; Ian Shrier; Michael P Lunn; Ruth Brassington; Rob J P Scholten; Georgia Salanti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.