Literature DB >> 8767946

[Choice of procedure in therapy of distal median nerve compression syndrome].

A Frick1, R G Baumeister, R Kopp.   

Abstract

Endoscopic carpal tunnel release is frequently recommended. This technique allows only for division of the retinaculum flexorum, but does not enable the surgeon to address concommitant synovialitis or compression of the motor branch of the median nerve. In 67 patients, we attempted to differentiate the indications for procedures by endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release. Beside an electrophysiological investigation, sonography of the wrist was performed to evaluate the extent of accompanying tenosynovialitis of the flexor tendons. A possible participation of the thenar branch was examined by electromyography. If there were no additional pathologic findings in the preoperative diagnostic work-up, a simple carpal tunnel release was performed. In all other cases, open surgical release was performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8767946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir        ISSN: 0722-1819            Impact factor:   1.018


  3 in total

Review 1.  Analysis of reporting return to work in studies comparing open with endoscopic carpal tunnel release: A review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Olubimpe Ayeni; Achilleas Thoma; Ted Haines; Sheila Sprague
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2005

2.  [Limited portal carpal tunnel release. An alternative to classic open release?].

Authors:  P Jaminet; F Werdin; J S Jabsen; A Kraus; N Sinis; H E Schaller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Opioid Use following Open versus Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: A Population Study.

Authors:  Jacquelyn A Withers; Gopal R Lalchandani; Ryan T Halvorson; Igor Immerman; Paymon Rahgozar
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-02-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.