Literature DB >> 8767945

[Agee endoscopic operation of carpal tunnel syndrome in comparison with open surgical technique].

W Schäfer1, K E Sander, A Walter, W U Weitbrecht.   

Abstract

In the course of a prospective randomised study, 120 patients underwent a carpal tunnel release procedure. The follow-up documentation included 101 patients. 54 patients had the conventional open procedure, including epineural neurolysis of the median nerve. 47 patients were treated with the Agee endoscopic procedure. The documentation included: patients age, sex, profession, duration of treatments, disablement, return to the activities of daily life (ADL) and pre- and postoperative neurological symptoms and postoperative complications. The electroneurographical measurements were performed preoperatively and nine months after operation by the same neurologist. The open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release procedures are described and the study results are reported. None of the 101 patients had wound-healing impairments. Clinical and neurological follow-up examinations did not reveal any signs of injured nerves or tendons. The study shows that the endoscopic group returned to work significantly earlier compared to the control group. At the same time, the Agee group had reduced postoperative pain symptoms. Regarding the long-term results, no significant difference between both groups was found. Based on the electrophysiological results, the study shows that epineural neurolysis of the median nerve is not necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8767945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir        ISSN: 0722-1819            Impact factor:   1.018


  7 in total

Review 1.  Analysis of reporting return to work in studies comparing open with endoscopic carpal tunnel release: A review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Olubimpe Ayeni; Achilleas Thoma; Ted Haines; Sheila Sprague
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2005

2.  Application of the CONSORT statement to randomized controlled trials comparing endoscopic and open carpal tunnel release.

Authors:  Achilleas Thoma; Roderick T Chew; Sheila Sprague; Karen Veltri
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2006

3.  A cost-utility analysis of open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release.

Authors:  Achilleas Thoma; Vanessa H Wong; Sheila Sprague; Eric Duku
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2006

Review 4.  Surgical treatment options for carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  R J P M Scholten; A Mink van der Molen; B M J Uitdehaag; L M Bouter; H C W de Vet
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17

5.  Optimizing Costs and Outcomes for Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis from Societal and Health-Care System Perspectives.

Authors:  Miranda J Rogers; Andrew R Stephens; Minkyoung Yoo; Richard E Nelson; Nikolas H Kazmers
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Advances of peripheral nerve repair techniques to improve hand function: a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  P Mafi; S Hindocha; M Dhital; M Saleh
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2012-02-23

Review 7.  Endoscopic and Open Release Similarly Safe for the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Haris S Vasiliadis; Adriani Nikolakopoulou; Ian Shrier; Michael P Lunn; Ruth Brassington; Rob J P Scholten; Georgia Salanti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.