Literature DB >> 8766732

The effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Aspergillus oryzae on fermentations in the rumen of faunated and defaunated sheep; protozoal and probiotic interactions.

F Mathieu1, J P Jouany, J Sénaud, J Bohatier, G Bertin, M Mercier.   

Abstract

We measured the effect of the direct addition to the rumen of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC 50 mg/day) and Aspergillus oryzae (AO 3 g/day) on the fermentation processes in fistulated sheep. The measurements were carried out on animals whose rumens were first defaunated and then refaunated. The animals received a ration composed of hay (600 g/day), barley (600 g/day) and soybean meal (150 g/day), fed twice daily in two equal meals. The number of fungi and total, viable or cellulolytic bacteria were lower after the inoculation of protozoa in defaunated rumens. The probiotics stimulated the development of total bacteria but reduced the population of cellulolytic bacteria. The addition of the probiotics and the presence of protozoa each incurred a decrease in the redox potential values. The association of both treatments had an additive effect on this parameter. The two probiotics and the protozoa stabilized the rumen pH after the meal, maintaining it above the value of 6 for a longer period of time. The positive effects on pH were accumulated in the refaunated animals receiving probiotics. The ammonia nitrogen concentration was considerably increased by the presence of the protozoa; the probiotics increased the ammonia concentration only in the refaunated sheep. The methane and hydrogen proportions in the fermentation gases were invariably higher in the refaunated animals. The probiotics had no clear effect either on the gas composition or the concentration and the composition of the mixture of volatile fatty acids; only the concentration of isovalerate was significantly increased by probiotics and only in refaunated animals. The protozoa did, however, considerably increase the concentrations of acetate, butyrate and isoacids and decreased the concentration of caproate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8766732     DOI: 10.1051/rnd:19960305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Nutr Dev        ISSN: 0926-5287


  5 in total

1.  Enteric methane mitigation technologies for ruminant livestock: a synthesis of current research and future directions.

Authors:  Amlan Kumar Patra
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 2.  Effects and immune responses of probiotic treatment in ruminants.

Authors:  Sarah Raabis; Wenli Li; Laura Cersosimo
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2019-01-06       Impact factor: 2.046

3.  Comparative Analysis of the Microbiota Between Sheep Rumen and Rabbit Cecum Provides New Insight Into Their Differential Methane Production.

Authors:  Lan Mi; Bin Yang; Xialu Hu; Yang Luo; Jianxin Liu; Zhongtang Yu; Jiakun Wang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Effects of live yeast supplementation on serum oxidative stress biomarkers and lactation performance in dairy cows during summer.

Authors:  Ahmad Nawid Mirzad; Akira Goto; Takuto Endo; Hitoshi Ano; Ikuo Kobayashi; Takenori Yamauchi; Hiromu Katamoto
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 1.267

5.  In vitro fermentation and production of methane and carbon dioxide from rations containing Moringa oleifera leave silage as a replacement of soybean meal: in vitro assessment.

Authors:  Tarek A Morsy; Gouda A Gouda; Ahmed E Kholif
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 5.190

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.