Literature DB >> 8765678

A three-locus system of interspecific incompatibility underlies male inviability in hybrids between Drosophila buzzatii and D. koepferae.

A R Carvajal1, M R Gandarela, H F Naveira.   

Abstract

In hybrids between the sibling species D. buzzatii and D. koepferae, both sexes are more or less equally viable in the F1. However, backcross males to D. buzzatii are frequently inviable, apparently because of interspecific genetic incompatibilities that are cryptic in the F1. We have performed a genetic dissection of the effects of the X chromosome from D. koepferae. We found only two cytological regions, termed hmi-1 and hmi-2, altogether representing 9% of the whole chromosome, which when introgressed into D. buzzatii cause inviability of hybrid males. Observation of the pattern of asynapsis of polytene chromosomes (incomplete pairing, marking introgressed material) in females and segregation analyses were the technique used to infer the X chromosome regions responsible for this hybrid male inviability. The comparison of these results with those previously obtained with the same technique for hybrid male sterility in this same species pair indicate that in the X chromosome of D. koepferae there are at least seven times more regions that produce hybrid male sterility than hybrid male inviability. We have also found that the inviability brought about by the introgression of hmi-1 is suppressed by the cointrogression of two autosomal sections from D. koepferae. Apparently, these three regions conform to a system of species-specific complementary factors involved in an X-autosome interaction that, when disrupted in backcross hybrids by recombination with the genome of its sibling D. buzzatii, brings about hybrid male inviability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8765678     DOI: 10.1007/bf00120214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  34 in total

Review 1.  Advances in the genetics of reproductive isolation in Drosophila.

Authors:  E Zouros
Journal:  Genome       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.166

Review 2.  Genetics and speciation.

Authors:  J A Coyne
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-02-06       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Evolution of postmating reproductive isolation: the composite nature of Haldane's rule and its genetic bases.

Authors:  C I Wu; A W Davis
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  A genetic basis for the inviability of hybrids between sibling species of Drosophila.

Authors:  P Hutter; J Roote; M Ashburner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Location of an autosomal factor causing sterility in Drosophila mojavensis males carrying the Drosophila arizonensis Y chromosome.

Authors:  A C Pantazidis; E Zouros
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Development of imaginal discs from lethal hybrids betweenDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila mauritiana.

Authors:  Lucas Sánchez; Andreas Dübendorfer
Journal:  Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1983-01

7.  Developmental anomalies in Drosophila hybrids are apparently caused by loss of microchromosome.

Authors:  H A Orr
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 8.  Controlling P element insertional mutagenesis.

Authors:  L Cooley; C Berg; A Spradling
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 11.639

9.  The Evolutionary History of DROSOPHILA BUZZATII. Xii. the Genetic Basis of Sterility in Hybrids between D. BUZZATII and Its Sibling D. SERIDO from Argentina.

Authors:  H Naveira; A Fontdevila
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Hybrid lethal systems in the Drosophila melanogaster species complex. II. The Zygotic hybrid rescue (Zhr) gene of D. melanogaster.

Authors:  K Sawamura; M T Yamamoto; T K Watanabe
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  8 in total

1.  Mapping of hybrid incompatibility loci in Nasonia.

Authors:  J Gadau; R E Page; J H Werren
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Dominance, epistasis and the genetics of postzygotic isolation.

Authors:  M Turelli; H A Orr
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The genetics of inviability and male sterility in hybrids between Anopheles gambiae and An. arabiensis.

Authors:  M Slotman; A Della Torre; J R Powell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Relative paucity of genes causing inviability in hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  J A Coyne; S Simeonidis; P Rooney
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  The evolutionary genetics of speciation.

Authors:  J A Coyne; H A Orr
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  The Drosophila melanogaster hybrid male rescue gene causes inviability in male and female species hybrids.

Authors:  D A Barbash; J Roote; M Ashburner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  A fine-scale genetic analysis of hybrid incompatibilities in Drosophila.

Authors:  Daven C Presgraves
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genetic architecture of hybrid male sterility in Drosophila: analysis of intraspecies variation for interspecies isolation.

Authors:  Laura K Reed; Brooke A LaFlamme; Therese A Markow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.