| Literature DB >> 8765244 |
Abstract
A serious ethical dilemma occurs when a pregnant woman refuses a medically indicated intervention. Should respect for her autonomy preclude any approach other than to accept her decision? Should the caregivers have recourse to "gentle persuasion"? Is there ever a justification for invoking the power of court-ordered intervention? The societal views on this subject are first developed from an ethical perspective. The pertinent court cases that reflect on this topic are reviewed. The process of developing guidelines within our institution is related. Finally, the guidelines that were eventually developed are offered.Entities:
Keywords: Genetics and Reproduction; In re A.C.; In re Baby Boy Doe v. Mother Doe; In re Madyun; Jefferson v. Griffin Spalding Co. Hospital Authority; Legal Approach; Professional Patient Relationship; University of Virginia Health Services Center
Mesh:
Year: 1996 PMID: 8765244 DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70137-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol ISSN: 0002-9378 Impact factor: 8.661