Literature DB >> 8764270

Comparison of biaxial mechanical properties of excised endocardium and epicardium.

T Kang1, J D Humphrey, F C Yin.   

Abstract

A complete understanding of cardiac mechanics requires knowledge of the mechanical properties of each of the tissues that comprise the heart, Data and constitutive relations are available for the nonlinear multiaxial behavior of epicardium and noncontracting myocardium, but there have been no comparable results for endocardium. In this paper, we present biaxial mechanical data for endocardium and epicardium excised from the same bovine hearts. The data reveal that these two membranes behave differently; endocardium exhibits a greater stiffness in the low-strain range. Moreover, quantification of endocardial behavior requires a seven-parameter, polynomial-exponential pseudostrain-energy function w, whereas epicardium can be described by a four-parameter exponential w. Comparison of our current findings with previous results on canine epicardium reveals further that canine and bovine epicardium behave similarly, although the latter is more extensible. Thus there appear to be marked species differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8764270     DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.1996.270.6.H2169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol        ISSN: 0002-9513


  9 in total

1.  A passive strain-energy function for elastic and muscular arteries: correlation of material parameters with histological data.

Authors:  Dimitrios P Sokolis
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  The visceral pericardium: macromolecular structure and contribution to passive mechanical properties of the left ventricle.

Authors:  Paul D Jöbsis; Hiroshi Ashikaga; Han Wen; Emily C Rothstein; Keith A Horvath; Elliot R McVeigh; Robert S Balaban
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  Epicardial prestrained confinement and residual stresses: a newly observed heart ventricle confinement interface.

Authors:  Xiaodan Shi; Yue Liu; Katherine M Copeland; Sara R McMahan; Song Zhang; J Ryan Butler; Yi Hong; Michael Cho; Pietro Bajona; Huajian Gao; Jun Liao
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  In vivo assessment of regional mechanics post-myocardial infarction: A focus on the road ahead.

Authors:  Eva Romito; Tarek Shazly; Francis G Spinale
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2017-02-23

5.  Mechanical changes in the rat right ventricle with decellularization.

Authors:  Colleen Witzenburg; Ramesh Raghupathy; Stefan M Kren; Doris A Taylor; Victor H Barocas
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Human annulus fibrosus material properties from biaxial testing and constitutive modeling are altered with degeneration.

Authors:  Grace D O'Connell; Sounok Sen; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2011-07-12

7.  Minimally invasive implantable fetal micropacemaker: mechanical testing and technical refinements.

Authors:  Li Zhou; Adriana Nicholson Vest; Raymond A Peck; Jonathan P Sredl; Xuechen Huang; Yaniv Bar-Cohen; Michael J Silka; Jay D Pruetz; Ramen H Chmait; Gerald E Loeb
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 8.  Regulators of cardiac fibroblast cell state.

Authors:  Ross Bretherton; Darrian Bugg; Emily Olszewski; Jennifer Davis
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 11.583

9.  Anisotropic engineered heart tissue made from laser-cut decellularized myocardium.

Authors:  Jonas Schwan; Andrea T Kwaczala; Thomas J Ryan; Oscar Bartulos; Yongming Ren; Lorenzo R Sewanan; Aaron H Morris; Daniel L Jacoby; Yibing Qyang; Stuart G Campbell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.