Literature DB >> 8763900

The limiting radiosensitisation of tumours by S-phase sensitisers.

J F Fowler1, T J Kinsella.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to improve local control and survival of patients with radioresistant tumours by sensitising proliferating cells using halogenated analogues of thymidine, with emphasis on increasing the proportion of tumour cells that incorporate the sensitiser. It has been found clinically that 2 weeks of continuous infusion of IUdR at 1000 mg m-2 per day can be tolerated, followed after a gap by a third week of the same. The sensitising compound is taken up only into those cells which are in S-phase at the time of administration. It is assumed that if the same total dose of 3 g m-2 were administered spread evenly over a longer period, it would be tolerated at least as well, and a higher proportion of tumour cells would become sensitised (labelled with IUdR). The question then arises: is the reduced concentration of IUdR enough to cause significant radiosensitisation? This question was investigated in two contrasting lines of human colon cancer in vitro. It is essential that at least 90% of all clonogenic tumour cells should be labelled with the IUdR (that is 1 log), or else the sensitiser enhancement ratio (SER) cannot be expected to exceed 1.1. Similarly, to reach an SER of 1.2, we should label 99% of cells (2 logs labelled). To achieve such proportions labelled, infusions would have to be 5 or 10 times longer than the population doubling time of clonogenic cells Tpot that is of several weeks duration. The infusion should be either continuous or perhaps better-by repeated small boluses at intervals of less than T (duration of DNA synthesis), so that no proliferating cells escape being exposed to the IUdR. It is shown that LIs (labelling indices) of 94% can be obtained with SERs ranging from 1.5 to 3.0 and 99% with SERs from 1.2 to 2.4, in the two most contrasting human colon cancer cell lines for which data are available. Longer, lower dose infusions than previously used should be considered so as to emphasise the importance of not allowing any potentially clonogenic tumour cells to pass through S-phase without labelling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8763900      PMCID: PMC2150020     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer Suppl        ISSN: 0306-9443


  13 in total

1.  Halogenated pyrimidines as radiosensitizers for high grade glioma: revisited.

Authors:  R Rodriguez; T J Kinsella
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Linear-quadratic analysis of radiosensitization by halogenated pyrimidines. I. Radiosensitization of human colon cancer cells by iododeoxyuridine.

Authors:  E M Miller; J F Fowler; T J Kinsella
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Treatment of locally advanced cancer of the head and neck with 5'-iododeoxyuridine and hyperfractionated radiation therapy: measurement of cell labeling and thymidine replacement.

Authors:  A H Epstein; R S Lebovics; T Goffman; D Teague; E S Fuetsch; E Glatstein; P Okunieff; J A Cook
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1994-12-07       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Iododeoxyuridine (IUdR) combined with radiation in the treatment of malignant glioma: a comparison of short versus long intravenous dose schedules (RTOG 86-12).

Authors:  R C Urtasun; D Cosmatos; J DelRowe; T J Kinsella; S Lester; T Wasserman; D S Fulton
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1993-09-30       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Evaluation of bromodeoxyuridine in glioblastoma multiforme: a Northern California Cancer Center Phase II study.

Authors:  T L Phillips; V A Levin; D K Ahn; P H Gutin; R L Davis; C B Wilson; M D Prados; W M Wara; M S Flam
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  National Cancer Institute (phase II) study of high-grade glioma treated with accelerated hyperfractionated radiation and iododeoxyuridine: results in anaplastic astrocytoma.

Authors:  F J Sullivan; L L Herscher; J A Cook; J Smith; S M Steinberg; A H Epstein; E H Oldfield; T E Goffman; T J Kinsella; J B Mitchell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1994-10-15       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Bromodeoxyuridine-mediated radiosensitization in human glioma: the effect of concentration, duration, and fluoropyrimidine modulation.

Authors:  P W McLaughlin; T S Lawrence; H Seabury; N Nguyen; P L Stetson; H S Greenberg; W R Mancini
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1994-10-15       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Pharmacology and phase I/II study of continuous intravenous infusions of iododeoxyuridine and hyperfractionated radiotherapy in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  T J Kinsella; J Collins; J Rowland; R Klecker; D Wright; D Katz; S M Steinberg; E Glastein
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  The dependence of halogenated pyrimidine incorporation and radiosensitization on the duration of drug exposure.

Authors:  T S Lawrence; M A Davis; J Maybaum; P L Stetson; W D Ensminger
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Measurement of cell kinetics in human tumours in vivo using bromodeoxyuridine incorporation and flow cytometry.

Authors:  G D Wilson; N J McNally; S Dische; M I Saunders; C Des Rochers; A A Lewis; M H Bennett
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  Targeted radiosensitisation by pegylated liposome-encapsulated 3', 5'-O-dipalmitoyl 5-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine in a head and neck cancer xenograft model.

Authors:  K J Harrington; K N Syrigos; P S Uster; A Zetter; C R Lewanski; W J Gullick; R G Vile; J S W Stewart
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-07-19       Impact factor: 7.640

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.