Literature DB >> 8758637

Processing of adenoid and tonsil specimens in children: a national survey of standard practices and a five-year review of the experience at the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh.

J E Dohar1, J A Bonilla.   

Abstract

The best means of pathologically examining routine tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy specimens in children remains controversial. Otolaryngologists fear missing an unsuspected diagnosis. However, the cost-effectiveness of microscopic analysis, given the rare incidence of unsuspected diagnosis, is questionable. If a significant pathologic diagnosis is missed, the medicolegal implications could be significant. A questionnaire was sent to 111 members of the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology. Additionally, we reviewed our experience at the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh for the 5-year span from 1989 to 1994 to determine our incidence of unsuspected pathologic diagnoses. Sixty-five questionnaires were returned (59% response rate). More than half (56%) of the respondents stated that microscopic analysis was routinely performed on all specimens, and 42% replied that only gross examination was performed, reserving microscopic examination for selected cases. Three respondents said that they discarded their specimens in the operating room. From March 1989 to October 1994, in 1985 children undergoing bilateral tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy at the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, no significant pathologic diagnoses were found. Twenty-seven additional children who underwent only tonsillectomy between January 1991 and October 1994 were also reviewed. One lymphoma, suspected before surgery, and a glycogen storage disorder, not suspected before surgery, were diagnosed. Therefore, in a total of 2012 children, we found only one clinically significant unsuspected diagnosis. In conclusion, we found no national consensus governing the best way to examine routine adenotonsillectomy specimens in children. Given that unsuspected diagnoses are rare, reserving microscopic analysis for specific clinical indications may be both more cost-effective and medically feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8758637     DOI: 10.1016/S0194-5998(96)70143-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  11 in total

1.  [S1 Clinical guideline"adenoids and adenoidectomy"].

Authors:  T Wilhelm; G Hilger; K Begall; J Lautermann; O Kaschke; P Mir-Salim; T Zahnert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Histological examination following adenoidectomy and tonsillectomy in children. Surprising results are very rare].

Authors:  P Dost
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  Malignancy in routine tonsillectomy specimens: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Malene Sine Rokkjaer; Tejs Ehlers Klug
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  [Histology after adenoidectomy/tonsillectomy? No conformity in Germany concerning the histopathological examination of adenoids or tonsils in children up to the age of 10 years].

Authors:  P Dost
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Incidence and survival trends in patients with primary tonsillar lymphoma: a large population-based study.

Authors:  Yan Liang; Haidong Zhang; Yonghong Wu; Min Li
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Tonsillectomy and hematologic malignancy: Should routine pediatric tonsillectomy specimens be sent to pathology?

Authors:  Kaitlyn Tholen; Olivia Kalmanson; Christian R Francom; Jeremy D Prager
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 1.675

7.  [Histology after tonsillectomy?].

Authors:  A Schrock; M Jakob; T Send; L Heukamp; M Bucheler; F Bootz
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Histological study of routine tonsillectomy specimen.

Authors:  Shitij Arora; Manasi Agrawal; Murtaza Nazmi; N K Kapoor
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-11-07

Review 9.  Malpractice claims and unintentional outcome of tonsil surgery and other standard procedures in otorhinolaryngology.

Authors:  Jochen P Windfuhr
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-12-13

10.  Is it Effective and Cost-saving to Send all Tonsillectomy Specimens for Histopathological Examinations?

Authors:  Mohammad Faramarzi; Mohsen Ghaffari Darab; Abdosaleh Jafari; Hatam Salehpour; Masoud Janipour; Sareh Roosta; Khosro Keshavarz
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.