Literature DB >> 8758378

Prognostic significance of lymph node metastasis in surgical resection of esophageal cancer.

K Sun1, R Zhang, D Zhang, G Huang, L Wang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although surgery is relatively successful in eradicating local tumor, post-resection five-year survival rate for esophageal cancer is still lower than 30%. Multiple factors are found to influence the long-term results after surgical treatment. However, recent investigations have focused on the significance of lymph node matastasis (LNM), which seems to be one of the most important factors leading to poor survival. Hence, the prognostic significance of LNM in surgical resection of esophageal cancer was studied.
METHODS: The rate and degree of LNM were evaluated and their prognostic significance was investigated through a retrospective study of 474 patients with esophageal cancer treated by surgery alone.
RESULTS: LNM was positive in 211 patients, with an incidence of 44.5% (211/474). A total of 5382 lymph nodes were resected and studied pathologically, among which metastasis was found in 690 nodes with an overall LNM degree of 12.8% (690/5382). The 5-year survival rate was 30.6% (145/474) in the entire series, 12.8% (27/211) in patients with LNM, and 44.9% (118/263) in those without LNM.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgery remains the first choice of treatment for carcinoma of the esophagus, and that meticulous lymph node dissection is an important practice of surgical oncology. However, in more advanced cases of this disease, surgery alone is of limited value in eradicating all cancer compromized tissue, and therefore the routine practice of extensive lymph node dissection in such cases may not be rewarding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8758378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)        ISSN: 0366-6999            Impact factor:   2.628


  4 in total

Review 1.  The significance of lymph node status as a prognostic factor for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Yasunori Akutsu; Hisahiro Matsubara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Circumferential resection margin involvement: an independent predictor of survival following surgery for oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  S P Dexter; H Sue-Ling; M J McMahon; P Quirke; N Mapstone; I G Martin
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer, followed by chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Hung-Chang Liu; Shih-Kai Hung; Charn-Jer Huang; Chung-Chu Chen; Ming-Jen Chen; Chun-Chao Chang; Cheng-Jeng Tai; Chi-Yuan Tzen; Li-Hua Lu; Yu-Jen Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Efficacy and safety of esophagectomy via left thoracic approach versus via right thoracic approach for middle and lower thoracic esophageal cancer: a multicenter randomized clinical trial (NST1501).

Authors:  You-Sheng Mao; Shu-Geng Gao; Yin Li; An-Lin Hao; Jun-Feng Liu; Xiao-Fei Li; Tie-Hua Rong; Jian-Hua Fu; Jian-Qun Ma; Mei-Qing Xu; Ren-Quan Zhang; Gao-Ming Xiao; Xiang-Ning Fu; Ke-Neng Chen; Wei-Min Mao; Yong-Yu Liu; Hong-Xu Liu; Zhi-Rong Zhang; Yan Fang; Dong-Hong Fu; Xu-Dong Wei; Li-Gong Yuan; Shan Muhammad; Wen-Qiang Wei; Philip Wai-Yan Chiu; Shane Lloyd; Francisco Schlottmann; Kenneth Meredith; Jose M Pimiento; Yi-Bo Gao; Jie He
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.