Literature DB >> 8757354

Performance of alcoholism screening questionnaires in elderly veterans.

J L Morton1, T V Jones, M A Manganaro.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To validate three alcoholism screening questionnaires in elderly male veterans. PATIENTS: Participants were 120 male veterans aged 65 years or older.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, consecutive patients in the outpatient general medical practice at the Omaha VA Medical Center were interviewed with the alcohol module of the Revised Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS-III-R) and three alcoholism screening questionnaires, the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test-Geriatric Version (MAST-G), the CAGE, and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Performance characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, and areas under the receiver operating curve [ROC]) of the screening questionnaires were determined in comparison with the DIS-III-R.
RESULTS: Forty-three participants (36%) met DSM-III-R (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) criteria for alcohol abuse or dependence; 23% were active drinkers and 13% were inactive. Fifty of the 120 (42%) reported abstinence from drinking during the preceding year. A MAST-G score > or = 5 had a sensitivity and specificity of 70% and 81%, respectively. A CAGE score > or = 2 had a sensitivity and specificity of 63% and 82%. Using active drinkers only, an AUDIT score of > or = 8 had a sensitivity and specificity of 33% and 91%. The positive predictive values (PPV) for the MAST-G, CAGE, and AUDIT were 67%, 66%, and 69%, respectively; the negative predictive values were 83%, 80%, and 68%, respectively. Areas under the receiver operating curves for the MAST-G, CAGE, and AUDIT were 0.84 +/- 0.04, 0.77 +/- 0.05, and 0.56 +/- 0.08, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The MAST-G and the CAGE outperformed the AUDIT for detecting alcohol abuse and dependence in an elderly male veteran population. The CAGE, requiring only four easily memorized questions to achieve similar accuracy, appears to offer an advantage over the 24-item MAST-G.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8757354     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(96)80069-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  7 in total

Review 1.  The epidemiology of substance use disorders in US Veterans: A systematic review and analysis of assessment methods.

Authors:  Chiao-Wen Lan; David A Fiellin; Declan T Barry; Kendall J Bryant; Adam J Gordon; E Jennifer Edelman; Julie R Gaither; Stephen A Maisto; Brandon D L Marshall
Journal:  Am J Addict       Date:  2015-12-22

2.  Alcohol use disorders identification test has bias.

Authors:  Rahul Rao
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-18

3.  Patient and practitioner characteristics predict brief alcohol intervention in primary care.

Authors:  E F Kaner; N Heather; J Brodie; C A Lock; B R McAvoy
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Physician awareness of alcohol use disorders among older patients.

Authors:  M C Reid; M E Tinetti; C J Brown; J Concato
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Screening for problem drinking: comparison of CAGE and AUDIT. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test.

Authors:  K A Bradley; K R Bush; M B McDonell; T Malone; S D Fihn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Usefulness of Alcohol-screening Instruments in Detecting Problem Drinking among Elderly Male Drinkers.

Authors:  Young Il Ryou; Jong Sung Kim; Jin Gyu Jung; Sung Soo Kim; Dong Hyun Choi
Journal:  Korean J Fam Med       Date:  2012-05-24

7.  Pharmacotherapy of smoking cessation.

Authors:  R C Jiloha
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.759

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.