Literature DB >> 8757210

A prospective, controlled study showing that rubber gloves are the major contributor to latex aeroallergen levels in the operating room.

D K Heilman1, R T Jones, M C Swanson, J W Yunginger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although protocols have been published for reducing natural rubber latex exposure in medical environments, there are no objective data documenting their effectiveness.
OBJECTIVE: We prospectively studied the impact of a single intervention, substitution of low-allergen-containing latex gloves for high-allergen-containing latex gloves, on latex aeroallergen levels in a single operating room (OR).
METHODS: We sampled OR air on 52 consecutive days, including 33 surgery days and 19 nonsurgery days. On each surgery day all personnel wore either high-allergen gloves (n = 18 days) or low-allergen gloves (n = 15 days). Latex aeroallergen levels (in nanograms per cubic meter) and extractable latex glove allergen contents (in allergen units per milliliter) were measured by inhibition immunoassays. An on-site study monitor recorded the number of gloves used, the total time spent by all patients in the OR each day (OR time), and the total time of all procedures for each day (operating procedure time).
RESULTS: Latex aeroallergen levels during low-allergen glove use days (mean, 1.1 ng/m3; median, 0.9 ng/m3; range, 0.1 to 3.5 ng/m3) were significantly lower than on high-allergen glove use days (mean, 13.7 ng/m3; median, 7.7 ng/m3; range, 2.2 to 56.4 ng/m3) (p < 0.001) but not significantly different from that on nonsurgery days (mean, 0.6 ng/m3; median, 0.3 ng/m3; range, 0.1 to 3.6 ng/m3). Latex aeroallergen levels were strongly correlated with the total number of gloves used on designated high-allergen glove days (r = 0.66, p = 0.003). There was no appreciable day-to-day carryover of latex aeroallergen.
CONCLUSIONS: The substitution of low-allergen-containing latex gloves for high-allergen-containing latex gloves can reduce levels of latex aeroallergen by more than 10-fold in an OR environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8757210     DOI: 10.1016/s0091-6749(96)70157-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  7 in total

Review 1.  Primary prevention of latex related sensitisation and occupational asthma: a systematic review.

Authors:  A D LaMontagne; S Radi; D S Elder; M J Abramson; M Sim
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Latex allergy: epidemiological study of 1351 hospital workers.

Authors:  G M Liss; G L Sussman; K Deal; S Brown; M Cividino; S Siu; D H Beezhold; G Smith; M C Swanson; J Yunginger; A Douglas; D L Holness; P Lebert; P Keith; S Wasserman; K Turjanmaa
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Effectiveness of a nationwide interdisciplinary preventive programme for latex allergy.

Authors:  Ute Latza; Frank Haamann; Xaver Baur
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 4.  Latex allergy in children: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  P K Birmingham; S Suresh
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 5.  Latex allergy: review of recent advances.

Authors:  D A Levy; F Leynadier
Journal:  Curr Allergy Rep       Date:  2001-01

6.  Quantification of protein and latex allergen content of various natural rubber latex products.

Authors:  Y von der Gathen; I Sander; A Flagge; T Brüning; M Raulf-Heimsoth
Journal:  Allergol Select       Date:  2017-08-04

7.  Latex allergy and occupational asthma in health care workers: adverse outcomes.

Authors:  Sania Amr; William A Suk
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.