Literature DB >> 8756846

Defecography and proctography. Results of 744 patients.

F Agachan1, J Pfeifer, S D Wexner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Radiographic imaging of dynamic changes within the pelvic cavity and rectum during evacuation has been recognized as a valuable method of assessment. This study was designed to assess the incidence and clinical significance of defecographic findings in patients with possible evacuation disorders.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All defecographic studies were reviewed by a single colorectal surgeon familiar with patients' histories and physical findings.
RESULTS: Between July 1988 and July 1995, 744 patients (566 females and 178 males) with a mean age of 63.5 (range, 12-95) years had defecographic and proctographic examination. Four hundred forty-six (60 percent) patients were diagnosed who complained of constipation, 123 (16.5 percent) of fecal incontinence, 42 (5.6 percent) of rectal prolapse, 82 (11 percent) of rectal pain, and 51 (6.9 percent) had a combination of more than one of these diagnoses. Although 93 (12.5 percent) of these evaluations were considered normal, 61 (8 percent) revealed rectal prolapse, 191 (25.7 percent) rectocele, 82 (11 percent) sigmoidocele, and 94 (12.6 percent) intussusception; in 223 (30 percent) patients, a combination of these findings was noted. Patients with paradoxical puborectalis contraction had an extremely high frequency of constipation compared with other symptoms (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Defecography can reveal abnormalities in the majority of patients with evacuatory disorders. There was a high incidence of rectocele, sigmoidocele, and intussusception. Care must be taken not to treat patients strictly based on radiographic findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8756846     DOI: 10.1007/bf02053989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  30 in total

1.  Detection of a rectocele-like prolapse in the colonic J-pouch using pouchography: cause or effect of evacuation difficulties?

Authors:  J Hida; M Yasutomi; T Maruyama; T Yoshifuji; T Tokoro; T Wakano; T Uchida; K Ueda
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  [Differential diagnosis in descending perineum syndrome].

Authors:  O Schwandner; F Poschenrieder; H-B Gehl; H-P Bruch
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Management of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2008-11

4.  Role of pelvicography and colpocystodefecography in diagnosis of outlet obstructive constipation.

Authors:  Bao-Hua Liu; Shi-Wen Fang; Wei-Dong Tong; Shui-Gen Gong; Sheng-Ben Zhang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Paradoxical puborectalis contraction and increased perineal descent.

Authors:  Ron G Landmann; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-05

6.  Rectal prolapse.

Authors:  David P O'Brien
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-05

7.  The evaluation of constipation.

Authors:  Matthew D Vrees; Eric G Weiss
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-05

8.  Anorectal physiologic evaluation of constipation.

Authors:  Paula Denoya; Dana R Sands
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-05

9.  Constipation and obstructed defecation.

Authors:  Scott R Steele; Anders Mellgren
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-05

10.  Defecographic pelvic floor abnormalities in constipated patients: does mode of delivery matter?

Authors:  Sthela Murad-Regadas; Thais V Peterson; Rodrigo A Pinto; F Sergio P Regadas; Dana R Sands; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.