Literature DB >> 8755383

Improving coded data entry by an electronic patient record system.

J H Hohnloser1, F Puerner, H Soltanian.   

Abstract

Data are presented on the use of a browsing and encoding utility to improve coded data entry for an electronic patient record system. Traditional and computerized discharge summaries were compared: during three phases of coding ICD-9 diagnoses phase I, no coding; phase II, manual coding, and phase III, computerized semiautomatic coding. Our data indicate that (1) only 50% of all diagnoses in a discharge summary are encoded manually; (2) using a computerized browsing and encoding utility this percentage may increase by 64%; (3) when forced to encode manually, users may "shift" as much as 84% of relevant diagnoses from the appropriate coding section to other sections thereby "bypassing" the need to encode, this was reduced by up to 41% with the computerized approach, and (4) computerized encoding can improve completeness of data encoding, from 46 to 100%. We conclude that the use of a computerized browsing and encoding tool can increase data quality and the percentage of documented data. Mechanisms bypassing the need to code can be avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8755383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Inf Med        ISSN: 0026-1270            Impact factor:   2.176


  6 in total

1.  Information technology in ophthalmology-experience with an electronic patient record.

Authors:  G W Aylward; D N Parmar
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Exploring the degree of concordance of coded and textual data in answering clinical queries from a clinical data repository.

Authors:  H D Stein; P Nadkarni; J Erdos; P L Miller
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  "Smart Forms" in an Electronic Medical Record: documentation-based clinical decision support to improve disease management.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Schnipper; Jeffrey A Linder; Matvey B Palchuk; Jonathan S Einbinder; Qi Li; Anatoly Postilnik; Blackford Middleton
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Comparing paper-based with electronic patient records: lessons learned during a study on diagnosis and procedure codes.

Authors:  Jurgen Stausberg; Dietrich Koch; Josef Ingenerf; Michael Betzler
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-06-04       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research.

Authors:  Nicole Gray Weiskopf; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Quality assurance of data collection in the multi-site community randomized trial and prevalence survey of the children's healthy living program.

Authors:  Ashley Yamanaka; Marie Kainoa Fialkowski; Lynne Wilkens; Fenfang Li; Reynolette Ettienne; Travis Fleming; Julianne Power; Jonathan Deenik; Patricia Coleman; Rachael Leon Guerrero; Rachel Novotny
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2016-09-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.