Literature DB >> 8753739

Maintaining quality of care and patient satisfaction with radical prostatectomy in the era of cost containment.

E A Klein1, J A Grass, D A Calabrese, R A Kay, W Sargeant, J F O'Hara.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of shortened hospital stay after radical retropubic prostatectomy on costs, adverse surgical outcomes, and patient satisfaction.
METHODS: The effect of changes in preoperative counseling, perioperative care, and analgesic management on hospital length of stay; mean cost per case and cost per hospital day; and 30-day complication, hospital readmission, and mortality rates were analyzed for a consecutive sample of 374 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy between July 1989 and November 1995. Satisfaction with length of stay, analgesic regimen, and surgical outcome was assessed in a random subset of 150 patients by anonymous questionnaire.
RESULTS: Length of stay (LOS) was shortened from a median 7 to 2 nights after surgery during the study (P < 0.0001), whereas the acute complication, 30-day readmission, and 30-day mortality rates remained constant. Reducing LOS resulted in a 43% decrease in mean cost per case while mean cost per day increased by 22% to 35%. Overall patient satisfaction was high, with 83.5% of patients rating LOS as "just right" and 89.2% reporting they were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with their pain control after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Shortened LOS after radical retropubic prostatectomy can be accomplished safely and can meet with high levels of patient satisfaction while significantly reducing hospital-related costs. The potential for further incremental reductions in cost with reductions in LOS to less than 2 nights appears to be small, and future efforts at cost reduction for this procedure should center on decreasing the intensity of care during hospitalization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8753739     DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00160-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  6 in total

Review 1.  The economic costs of early stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christopher S Saigal; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Enhanced recovery pathway for radical prostatectomy: Implementation and evaluation in a universal healthcare system.

Authors:  Hiba Abou-Haidar; Samuel Abourbih; David Braganza; Talal Al Qaoud; Lawrence Lee; Franco Carli; Deborah Watson; Armen G Aprikian; Simon Tanguay; Liane S Feldman; Wassim Kassouf
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  E A Klein; P A Kupelian
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2000-12

4.  Predictive factors for prolonged hospital stay after retropubic radical prostatectomy in a high-volume teaching center.

Authors:  Rafael F Coelho; Mauricio D Cordeiro; Guilherme P Padovani; Rafael Localli; Limirio Fonseca; José Pontes; Giuliano B Guglielmetti; Miguel Srougi; William Carlos Nahas
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

5.  Radical perineal prostatectomy - the contemporary resurgence of a genuinely minimally invasive procedure: Procedure outline. Comparison of the advantages, disadvantages, and outcomes of different surgical techniques of treating organ-confined prostate cancer (PCa). A literature review with special focus on perineal prostatectomy.

Authors:  Stanisław Wroński
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2012-09-04

6.  Latest Comprehensive Medical Resource Consumption in Robot-Assisted versus Laparoscopic and Traditional Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Szu-Yuan Wu; Shyh-Chyi Chang; Chang-I Chen; Chung-Chien Huang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 6.639

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.