OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to assess the predictive value of myocardial viability diagnosed by dobutamine transesophageal echocardiography and fluorine (F)-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for left ventricular functional recovery after revascularization in patients with chronic left ventricular dysfunction. BACKGROUND: The identification of akinetic but viable myocardium is of particular importance for the selection of patients with a compromised left ventricle who will benefit from coronary revascularization. METHODS:Multiplane rest and dobutamine transesophageal echocardiography (dobutamine, 5 and 10 microg/min per kg) studies and F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographic studies at rest were performed in 2 patients with 1) previous myocardial infarction and regional akinesia, 2) a stenosed infarct-related coronary artery, and 3) a patent infarct-related vessel after revascularization. A basally akinetic segment was considered viable by transesophageal echocardiography if dobutamine-induced contractile reserve could be observed. Viability by positron emission tomography was defined as F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake > or = 50% of the maximal uptake in a region with normal wall motion. Recovery of regional left ventricular function 4 to 6 months after revascularization was diagnosed by transesophageal echocardiography if > or = 50% of segments akinetic at baseline had improved wall thickening. RESULTS:Dobutamine transesophageal echocardiography identified viable infarct regions in 25 (59%) of 42 patients, and F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in 30 (71%) of 42 patients, yielding diagnostic agreement in 86% of patients. Sensitivity and specificity for prediction of left ventricular functional recovery in individual patients was 92% and 88%, respectively, for dobutamine transesophageal echocardiography versus 96% and 69% for F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Segments remaining akinetic after revascularization had a significantly lower (p < 0.001) F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake (48 +/- 15%) than that (73 +/- 15%) of segments with recovery of regional left ventricular function. CONCLUSIONS: Both dobutamine transesophageal echocardiography and F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography were highly sensitive in predicting functional recovery of chronically kinetic or dyskinetic myocardium after successful revascularization. Thus, dobutamine transesophageal echocardiography is a clinically valuable alternative to F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for assessing residual viability and predicting functional recovery after revascularization.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to assess the predictive value of myocardial viability diagnosed by dobutamine transesophageal echocardiography and fluorine (F)-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for left ventricular functional recovery after revascularization in patients with chronic left ventricular dysfunction. BACKGROUND: The identification of akinetic but viable myocardium is of particular importance for the selection of patients with a compromised left ventricle who will benefit from coronary revascularization. METHODS: Multiplane rest and dobutamine transesophageal echocardiography (dobutamine, 5 and 10 microg/min per kg) studies and F-18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographic studies at rest were performed in 2 patients with 1) previous myocardial infarction and regional akinesia, 2) a stenosed infarct-related coronary artery, and 3) a patent infarct-related vessel after revascularization. A basally akinetic segment was considered viable by transesophageal echocardiography if dobutamine-induced contractile reserve could be observed. Viability by positron emission tomography was defined as F-18fluorodeoxyglucose uptake > or = 50% of the maximal uptake in a region with normal wall motion. Recovery of regional left ventricular function 4 to 6 months after revascularization was diagnosed by transesophageal echocardiography if > or = 50% of segments akinetic at baseline had improved wall thickening. RESULTS:Dobutamine transesophageal echocardiography identified viable infarct regions in 25 (59%) of 42 patients, and F-18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in 30 (71%) of 42 patients, yielding diagnostic agreement in 86% of patients. Sensitivity and specificity for prediction of left ventricular functional recovery in individual patients was 92% and 88%, respectively, for dobutamine transesophageal echocardiography versus 96% and 69% for F-18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Segments remaining akinetic after revascularization had a significantly lower (p < 0.001) F-18fluorodeoxyglucose uptake (48 +/- 15%) than that (73 +/- 15%) of segments with recovery of regional left ventricular function. CONCLUSIONS: Both dobutamine transesophageal echocardiography and F-18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography were highly sensitive in predicting functional recovery of chronically kinetic or dyskinetic myocardium after successful revascularization. Thus, dobutamine transesophageal echocardiography is a clinically valuable alternative to F-18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for assessing residual viability and predicting functional recovery after revascularization.
Authors: Riemer H J A Slart; Jeroen J Bax; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Ernst E van der Wall; Rudi A J O Dierckx; Pieter L Jager Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2005-12-13 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Thomas Emil Christensen; Lia Evi Bang; Lene Holmvang; Adam Ali Ghotbi; Martin Lyngby Lassen; Flemming Andersen; Nikolaj Ihlemann; Hedvig Andersson; Peer Grande; Andreas Kjaer; Philip Hasbak Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-05-23 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: K Shimada; Y Sakanoue; Y Kobayashi; S Ehara; M Hirose; Y Nakamura; D Fukuda; H Yamagishi; M Yoshiyama; K Takeuchi; J Yoshikawa Journal: Heart Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: T Zaglavara; R Haaverstad; B Cumberledge; T Irvine; H Karvounis; G Parharidis; G Louridas; A Kenny Journal: Heart Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Riemer H J A Slart; Jeroen J Bax; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Ernst E van der Wall; Rudi A Dierckx; Jaep de Boer; Pieter L Jager Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2006 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Johannes Boehm; Felix Haas; Robert Bauernschmitt; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Bernhard Voss; Markus Schwaiger; Rüdiger Lange Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-01-21 Impact factor: 2.357