Literature DB >> 8752552

Clinical effectiveness of implant-supported single-tooth replacement: the Toronto Study.

L Avivi-Arber1, G A Zarb.   

Abstract

Forty-one patients received 49 single-tooth implants placed in different jaw locations. One implant was not osseointegrated at stage 2 surgery. Three successfully osseointegrated implants were not available for follow-up. Forty-five implants were monitored for 1 to 8 years after loading. Each one of the implants met all of the traditionally accepted success criteria, except for nine individual implants that did not meet the proposed bone level criterion. No success criteria exist for natural teeth adjacent to implants. Although preliminary results are favorable, extensive long-term studies are needed to determine which specific criteria comprise optimal functional and esthetic results with minimal risk of morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8752552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  11 in total

1.  A modified technique for extraoral cementation of implant retained restorations for preventing excess cement around the margins.

Authors:  Emir Yuzbasioglu
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 1.904

2.  Immediate Non-functional Loading of Single Tooth Uniti™ Implants into Avulsed Tooth Sockets Following Ridge Augmentation in the Anterior Maxilla: A Case Series.

Authors:  Radhakrishnan Vijayanathan; S Anil Kumar; Sanjeev Datana; Manab Kosala
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-09-18

3.  Evaluation of Hi-Tec Implant Restoration in Mandibular First Molar Region- A Prospective Clinical Study.

Authors:  Roopa Rani S Sreeram; L Krishna Prasad; P Srinivas Chakravarthi; Naga Neelima Devi; Vivekanand S Kattimani; Sanjay Krishna Sreeram
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-08-01

4.  Gingival recontouring by provisional implant restoration for optimal emergence profile: report of two cases.

Authors:  Mee-Kyoung Son; Hyun-Seon Jang
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2011-12-31       Impact factor: 2.614

5.  Influence of finish line in the distribution of stress trough an all ceramic implant-supported crown.: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  G Sannino; F Gloria; L Ottria; A Barlattani
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2010-03-04

6.  Accurate registration of peri-implant soft tissues to create an optimal emergence profile.

Authors:  Ibraheem Fahad Alshiddi; D Clin Dent
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2015-03

7.  Microstructured zirconia surfaces modulate osteogenic marker genes in human primary osteoblasts.

Authors:  Claudia Bergemann; Kathrin Duske; J Barbara Nebe; André Schöne; Ulrike Bulnheim; Hermann Seitz; Jens Fischer
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Fracture resistance of implant- supported monolithic crowns cemented to zirconia hybrid-abutments: zirconia-based crowns vs. lithium disilicate crowns.

Authors:  Shareen H Elshiyab; Noor Nawafleh; Andreas Öchsner; Roy George
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 1.904

9.  Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of Delayed and Early Loading of Single-Tooth Implant Placement: A 6-Month, Prospective, Randomized, Follow-up Clinical Study.

Authors:  Santhosh Sekar; Thangakumaran Suthanthiran; Arthiie Thangavelu; Sasi Kumar Karupannan; Fairlin Prem; Dhivya Rajendran
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2019-05

10.  Biocompatibility and Microstructure-Based Stress Analyses of TiNbZrTa Composite Films.

Authors:  Bo-Wei Lai; Yin-Yu Chang; Tzong-Ming Shieh; Heng-Li Huang
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.