S G Katz1, R D Kohl. 1. Huntington Memorial Hospital, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the institution of a clinical protocol combining 6 hours of recovery room observation and guidelines for intensive care unit (ICU) admission would allow selected patients to be safely transferred directly to a surgical floor after nonaortic arterial reconstruction. METHODS: After a clinical pathway was formed, 134 consecutive patients undergoing 154 nonaortic arterial operations were prospectively enrolled in this study. Patients requiring ICU care and the responsible factors were identified. Comparisons of risk factors and demographics were made between those patients who did and did not require ICU care. RESULTS: Twelve (7.8%) patients spent a total of 27 days in the ICU (range 1 to 11 days). As per our guidelines four patients were transferred to the ICU for invasive monitoring, and four were sent to the ICU because of refractory hemodynamic instability or arrhythmia in the postanesthetic recovery room. An additional four patients were transferred to the ICU after having been on the surgical floor for 24 to 72 hours because of the following perioperative complications: prolonged chest pain (one), pneumonia (one), heart failure (one), and graft occlusion requiring a urokinase infusion. Patients admitted to the ICU were more likely to have heart disease (p = 0.02) and to have had an operation other than carotid endarterectomy (p = 0.04) than those who were not. The 30-day mortality rate was 1.4%. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a clinical protocol similar to the one used in this study will allow many patients undergoing nonaortic vascular surgery to avoid the use of the ICU. This approach will conserve hospital and financial resources without adversely affecting patient morbidity and mortality rates.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the institution of a clinical protocol combining 6 hours of recovery room observation and guidelines for intensive care unit (ICU) admission would allow selected patients to be safely transferred directly to a surgical floor after nonaortic arterial reconstruction. METHODS: After a clinical pathway was formed, 134 consecutive patients undergoing 154 nonaortic arterial operations were prospectively enrolled in this study. Patients requiring ICU care and the responsible factors were identified. Comparisons of risk factors and demographics were made between those patients who did and did not require ICU care. RESULTS: Twelve (7.8%) patients spent a total of 27 days in the ICU (range 1 to 11 days). As per our guidelines four patients were transferred to the ICU for invasive monitoring, and four were sent to the ICU because of refractory hemodynamic instability or arrhythmia in the postanesthetic recovery room. An additional four patients were transferred to the ICU after having been on the surgical floor for 24 to 72 hours because of the following perioperative complications: prolonged chest pain (one), pneumonia (one), heart failure (one), and graft occlusion requiring a urokinase infusion. Patients admitted to the ICU were more likely to have heart disease (p = 0.02) and to have had an operation other than carotid endarterectomy (p = 0.04) than those who were not. The 30-day mortality rate was 1.4%. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a clinical protocol similar to the one used in this study will allow many patients undergoing nonaortic vascular surgery to avoid the use of the ICU. This approach will conserve hospital and financial resources without adversely affecting patient morbidity and mortality rates.