Literature DB >> 8751545

Intraabdominal lymphatic mapping to direct selective pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in women with high-risk endometrial cancer: results of a pilot study.

T W Burke1, C Levenback, C Tornos, M Morris, J T Wharton, D M Gershenson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of intraperitoneal lymphatic mapping of the uterine fundus as a means of identifying target sites for lymph node biopsy during staging laparotomy and to develop preliminary experience with the technique.
METHODS: Fifteen women with high-risk endometrial tumors were entered on this Institutional Review Board-approved pilot study. At laparotomy, isosulfan blue dye (1.0 ml) was injected into the subserosal myometrium at three sites: the superior midpoint of the fundus, 2 cm inferiorly on the anterior wall, and 2 cm inferiorly on the posterior wall. Dye uptake into lymphatic channels was observed for 10 min. The retroperitoneal spaces were opened. Blue lymphatic channels and nodes within the pelvic and paraaortic regions were identified. Nodes demonstrating dye uptake were biopsied as separate specimens: the locations of these nodes were carefully recorded. Hysterectomy and selective lymphadenectomy were then performed as usual.
RESULTS: Lymphatic channels coursing into the broad ligament and along the ovarian vessels were identified from all uteri injected. Deposition of dye into grossly identifiable lymph nodes was seen in 10 of 15 cases (67%). A total of 31 nodes demonstrated dye uptake. The locations of these nodes included paraaortic sites in 12, common iliac in 6, and pelvic in 13. No dye-containing paraaortic nodes were seen below the origin of the inferior mesenteric artery. Lymphatic channels coursing above the renal vessels were seen routinely. Microscopic nodal metastases to sentinel nodes were identified in 2 of 4 women with proven lymphatic spread.
CONCLUSIONS: Lymphatic mapping of the uterine fundus is feasible and can identify targets for selective nodal biopsy in some women. Preliminary observations confirm that the lymphatic network draining the uterus is complex and involves both pelvic and paraaortic nodes. Lymphatic channels that parallel the ovarian vessels were not observed to enter nodes until reaching the level of the midabdomen. Further experience and refinement of techniques may lead to the development of a selective lymphadenectomy based upon direct visualization of the lymphatic drainage of the uterus rather than the current random sampling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8751545     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1996.0211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  46 in total

1.  Survival advantage of lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Holm Eggemann; Tanja Ignatov; Katharina Kaiser; Elke Burger; Serban Dan Costa; Atanas Ignatov
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  Up-to-date management of lymph node metastasis and the role of tailored lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Noriaki Sakuragi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Sentinel lymph node in endometrial cancer: a review.

Authors:  Cyril Touboul; Enrica Bentivegna; Catherine Uzan; Sebastien Gouy; Patricia Pautier; Catherine Lhommé; Pierre Duvillard; Christine Haie-Meder; Philippe Morice
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Lymphadenectomy should be performed up to the renal vein in patients with intermediate-high risk endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Ismail Alay; Taner Turan; Isin Ureyen; Alper Karalok; Tolga Tasci; Ahmet Ozfuttu; M Faruk Kose; Gokhan Tulunay
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.201

5.  Detection of sentinel lymph nodes in minimally invasive surgery using indocyanine green and near-infrared fluorescence imaging for uterine and cervical malignancies.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Jewell; Juan Juan Huang; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Ginger J Gardner; Carol L Brown; Yukio Sonoda; Richard R Barakat; Douglas A Levine; Mario M Leitao
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Sentinel lymph node mapping for grade 1 endometrial cancer: is it the answer to the surgical staging dilemma?

Authors:  Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Fady Khoury-Collado; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Robert A Soslow; Fanny Dao; Yukio Sonoda; Douglas A Levine; Carol L Brown; Dennis S Chi; Richard R Barakat; Mary L Gemignani
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  UPDATE ON SENTINEL LYMPH NODE MAPPING IN ENDOMETRIAL CANCER PATIENTS WITH A HIGH RISK FOR NODAL METASTASIS.

Authors:  Derman Basaran; Mario M Leitao
Journal:  Indian J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-04-13

Review 8.  Sentinel lymph node mapping and staging in endometrial cancer: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology literature review with consensus recommendations.

Authors:  Robert W Holloway; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Floor J Backes; John F Boggess; Walter H Gotlieb; W Jeffrey Lowery; Emma C Rossi; Edward J Tanner; Rebecca J Wolsky
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-05-28       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Controversies in surgical staging of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  R Seracchioli; S Solfrini; M Mabrouk; C Facchini; N Di Donato; L Manuzzi; L Savelli; S Venturoli
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-06-23

Review 10.  Ultrastaging of lymph node in uterine cancers.

Authors:  Corinne Bézu; Charles Coutant; Marcos Ballester; Jean-Guillaume Feron; Roman Rouzier; Serge Uzan; Emile Daraï
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.