Literature DB >> 8751411

The "critical volume tolerance method" for estimating the limits of dose escalation during three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

M Roach1, B Pickett, M Weil, L Verhey.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the "Critical Volume Tolerance" (CVT) method for defining normal tissue tolerance during 3D-based dose escalation studies for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The CVT method predicts the tolerance to radiation for "in series"-type functional units based on the assumption that tolerance depends on a critical threshold "low-volume high-dose region." The data used for describing this model were generated from 3D analysis of randomly selected patients with prostate cancer. Commonly used coplanar four-and six-field conformal (SFC) techniques were chosen as the comparison techniques. For purposes of comparison, rectal tolerance was assumed to be reached following whole pelvic irradiation using a four-field box technique to 50 Gy, followed by a conedown boost to 70 Gy using bilateral 9 x 9 cm 120 degree arcs as popularized by investigators from Stanford University (SUH).
RESULTS: Based on the average dose volume histograms for the patients studied, the maximum safe increase in dose for the SFC technique compared to the SUH technique, would be 10% if 30% of the rectal volume was the critical dose limiting volume (CVT = 30%), 5% if the CVT = 10%, or greater than 20% if the CVT = 40%. Commonly used four-field conformal techniques would not be expected to allow significant escalation of the dose without increasing the risk of complications.
CONCLUSIONS: The CVT method is relatively simple, and data generated based on it can be used to support normal tissue complication probability equations. The CVT method can be verified or modified as partial tolerance data become available. Based on the CVT model, sophisticated treatment techniques should allow a modest increase in the total dose of radiation delivered to the prostate without an increase in late complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8751411     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(96)00252-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  4 in total

1.  An Evaluation of Robotic and Conventional IMRT for Prostate Cancer: Potential for Dose Escalation.

Authors:  Dilini S Pinnaduwage; Martina Descovich; Michael W Lometti; Badri Varad; Mack Roach; Alexander R Gottschalk
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-03-31

2.  Therapeutic Strategies for Localized Prostate Cancer II: Perineal Prostatectomy, X-Rays, Protons, Neutrons, and Combination Brachytherapy.

Authors:  M D Weil; A T Porter; D C Beyer; P S Albert; D Chinn; M J Harris
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2000

3.  Evaluation of late rectal toxicity after conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a comparison between dose-volume constraints and NTCP use.

Authors:  Raffaella Cambria; Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa; Federica Cattani; Cristina Garibaldi; Dario Zerini; Cristiana Fodor; Flavia Serafini; Guido Pedroli; Roberto Orecchia
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Improving plan quality and consistency by standardization of dose constraints in prostate cancer patients treated with CyberKnife.

Authors:  Martina Descovich; Mauro Carrara; Sara Morlino; Dilini S Pinnaduwage; Daniel Saltiel; Jean Pouliot; Marc B Nash; Emanuele Pignoli; Riccardo Valdagni; Mack Roach; Alexander R Gottschalk
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.