Literature DB >> 8751072

The effects of spaceflight on open-loop and closed-loop postural control mechanisms: human neurovestibular studies on SLS-2.

J J Collins1, C J De Luca, A E Pavlik, S H Roy, M S Emley.   

Abstract

Stabilogram-diffusion analysis was used to examine how prolonged periods in microgravity affect the open-loop and closed-loop postural control mechanisms. It was hypothesized that following spaceflight: (1) the effective stochastic activity of the open-loop postural control schemes in astronauts is increased; (2) the effective stochastic activity and uncorrelated behavior, respectively, of the closed-loop postural control mechanisms in astronauts are increased; and (3) astronauts utilized open-loop postural controls schemes for shorter time intervals and smaller displacements. Four crew members and two alternates from the 14-day Spacelab Life Sciences 2 Mission were included in the study. Each subject was tested under eyes-open, quiet-standing conditions on multiple preflight and postflight days. The subjects' center-of-pressure trajectories were measured with a force platform and analyzed according to stabilogram-diffusion analysis. It was found that the effective stochastic activity of the open-loop postural control schemes in three of the four crew members was increased following spaceflight. This result is interpreted as an indication that there may be in-flight adaptations to higher-level descending postural control pathways, e.g., a postflight increase in the tonic activation of postural muscles. This change may also be the consequence of a compensatory (e.g., "stiffening") postural control strategy that is adopted by astronauts to account for general feeling of postflight unsteadiness. The crew members, as a group, did not exhibit any consistent preflight/postflight differences in the steady-state behavior of their closed-loop postural control mechanisms or in the functional interaction of their open-loop and closed-loop postural control mechanisms. These results are interpreted as indications that although there may be in-flight adaptations to the vestibular system and/or proprioceptive system, input from the visual system can compensate for such changes during undisturbed stance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Neuroscience; NASA Discipline Number 00-00; NASA Program Flight; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8751072     DOI: 10.1007/bf00228026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  18 in total

1.  Pathophysiology of motor functions in prolonged manned space flights.

Authors:  I B Kozlovskaya; V S Oganov; O P Koserenko
Journal:  Acta Astronaut       Date:  1981 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.413

2.  Upright, correlated random walks: A statistical-biomechanics approach to the human postural control system.

Authors:  J. J. Collins; C. J. De Luca
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.642

3.  Random walking during quiet standing.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1994-08-01       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Recovery of postural equilibrium control following spaceflight.

Authors:  W H Paloski; M F Reschke; F O Black; D D Doxey; D L Harm
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1992-05-22       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Postural equilibrium following exposure to weightless space flight.

Authors:  J L Homick; M F Reschke
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1977 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.494

6.  Dynamic posture analysis of Spacelab-1 crew members.

Authors:  D J Anderson; M F Reschke; J E Homick; S A Werness
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  M.I.T./Canadian vestibular experiments on the Spacelab-1 mission: 1. Sensory adaptation to weightlessness and readaptation to one-g: an overview.

Authors:  L R Young; C M Oman; D G Watt; K E Money; B K Lichtenberg; R V Kenyon; A P Arrott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Open-loop and closed-loop control of posture: a random-walk analysis of center-of-pressure trajectories.

Authors:  J J Collins; C J De Luca
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Control scheme governing concurrently active human motor units during voluntary contractions.

Authors:  C J De Luca; R S LeFever; M P McCue; A P Xenakis
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Experimental analysis of motor effects of weightlessness.

Authors:  I B Kozlovskaya; I F Aslanova; L S Grigorieva
Journal:  Physiologist       Date:  1982-12
View more
  5 in total

1.  Differential integration of kinaesthetic signals to postural control.

Authors:  Brice Isableu; Nicolas Vuillerme
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Statistical analysis of quiet stance sway in 2-D.

Authors:  Avijit Bakshi; Paul DiZio; James R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Influence of a portable audio-biofeedback device on structural properties of postural sway.

Authors:  Marco Dozza; Lorenzo Chiari; Becky Chan; Laura Rocchi; Fay B Horak; Angelo Cappello
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 4.262

4.  Cardio-Hypothalamic-Pituitary Coupling during Rest and in Response to Exercise.

Authors:  Nathaniel T Berry; Christopher K Rhea; Laurie Wideman
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 2.738

5.  White matter hyperintensities and dynamics of postural control.

Authors:  Vera Novak; Mareile Haertle; Peng Zhao; Kun Hu; Medha Munshi; Peter Novak; Amir Abduljalil; David Alsop
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 2.546

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.