Literature DB >> 8750460

Quality-of-life end points in cancer clinical trials: the U.S. Food and Drug Administration perspective.

J Beitz1, C Gnecco, R Justice.   

Abstract

Increasingly, quality-of-life (QOL) end points are being incorporated into randomized, controlled clinical trials in oncology. The Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) has recommended that beneficial effects on QOL and/or survival be the basis for approval of new anticancer drugs. Therefore, from a regulatory standpoint, for drugs that do not have an impact on survival, demonstration of a favorable effect on QOL is more important than most other traditional measures used to assess efficacy, such as objective tumor response. Trials incorporating QOL questions will be evaluated on the basis of how well they address the stated objectives. The clinical protocol should delineate investigators' hypotheses and choice of validated instruments and should specify a detailed statistical analysis plan describing strategies for handling missing data. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration welcomes the opportunity to explore with investigators the use of QOL instruments in the design of cancer clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8750460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr        ISSN: 1052-6773


  21 in total

1.  Practice and policy of measuring quality of life and health economics in cancer clinical trials: a survey among co-operative trial groups.

Authors:  G Kiebert; S Wait; J Bernhard; A Bezjak; D Cella; R Day; J Houghton; C Moinpour; C Scott; R Stephens
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Using PROMIS® to create clinically meaningful profiles of nephrotic syndrome patients.

Authors:  Jonathan P Troost; Debbie S Gipson; Noelle E Carlozzi; Bryce B Reeve; Patrick H Nachman; Rasheed Gbadegesin; Jichuan Wang; Frank Modersitzki; Susan Massengill; John D Mahan; Yang Liu; Howard Trachtman; Emily G Herreshoff; Darren A DeWalt; David T Selewski
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  Health-related quality of life in cancer patients at the end of life, translation, validation, and longitudinal analysis of specific tools: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anne-Lise Poirier; Fabrice Kwiatkowski; Jean-Marie Commer; Bénédicte D'Aillières; Virginie Berger; Mariette Mercier; Franck Bonnetain
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Quality of life in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving palliative chemotherapy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ayako Matsuda; Kazue Yamaoka; Toshiro Tango
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Improved quality of life in patients with gastric cancer after esophagogastrostomy reconstruction.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Zhe Sun; Hui-Mian Xu; Ji-Xian Shan; Shu-Bao Wang; Jun-Qing Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Quality of life as a prognostic factor of overall survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: results from two French clinical trials.

Authors:  Franck Bonnetain; Xavier Paoletti; Sandra Collette; Michel Doffoel; Olivia Bouché; Jean Luc Raoul; Philippe Rougier; Fadil Masskouri; Jean Claude Barbare; Laurent Bedenne
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Quality of patient-reported outcome reporting according to the CONSORT statement in randomized controlled trials with glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Louis Garnier; Emilie Charton; Antoine Falcoz; Sophie Paget-Bailly; Dewi Vernerey; Marine Jary; François Ducray; Elsa Curtit
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2020-11-11

8.  Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in digestive oncology trials: which candidates? A questionnaires survey among clinicians and methodologists.

Authors:  Nicolas Methy; Laurent Bedenne; Franck Bonnetain
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Quality-of-life findings from a randomised phase-III study of XELOX vs FOLFOX-6 in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  T Conroy; M Hebbar; J Bennouna; M Ducreux; M Ychou; G Llédo; A Adenis; R Faroux; C Rebischung; L Kockler; J Y Douillard
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents: benefits and risks in supportive care of cancer.

Authors:  B L Melosky
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.