Literature DB >> 8750414

Functional aspects of recollective experience in face recognition.

A J Parkin1, J M Gardiner, R Rosser.   

Abstract

This article describes two experiments on awareness in recognition memory for novel faces. Two kinds of awareness, recollective experience and feelings of familiarity in the absence of recollective experience, were measured by "remember" and "know" responses. Experiment 1 showed that "remember" but not "know" responses were reduced by divided attention at study. Experiment 2 showed that massed versus spaced repetition of faces in the study list had opposite effects on "remember" and "know" responses. Massed repetition increased "know" responses and reduced "remember" responses. Spaced repetition increased "remember" responses and reduced "know" responses. The results of both experiments replicate previous findings from the verbal domain in the domain of face recognition, and hence they increase the ecological validity of this experimental approach to memory and awareness and the generality of its database. These findings are discussed from a rehearsal perspective on factors influencing the two states of awareness and in relation to the alternative "process dissociation" procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8750414     DOI: 10.1006/ccog.1995.1046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  14 in total

1.  Impact of encoding depth on awareness of perceptual effects in recognition memory.

Authors:  J M Gardiner; V H Gregg; R Mashru; M Thaman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-04

2.  Spacing effects in cued-memory tasks for unfamiliar faces and nonwords.

Authors:  Nicola Mammarella; Riccardo Russo; S E Avons
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-12

3.  Beneficial effects of verbalization and visual distinctiveness on remembering and knowing faces.

Authors:  Charity Brown; Toby J Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

4.  Recognition memory and awareness: occurrence of perceptual effects in remembering or in knowing depends on conscious resources at encoding, but not at retrieval.

Authors:  John M Gardiner; Vernon H Gregg; Irene Karayianni
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

5.  I'd know that face anywhere!

Authors:  Vincenza Gruppuso; D Stephen Lindsay; Michael E J Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-12

6.  The role of extralist associations in false remembering: a source misattribution account.

Authors:  David P McCabe; Lisa Geraci
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-03

7.  The low-frequency encoding disadvantage: Word frequency affects processing demands.

Authors:  Rachel A Diana; Lynne M Reder
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  [Patient endangerment due to device diversity? : Discussion of a risk factor based on the results of two surveys of German hospitals].

Authors:  K Lange; A Brinker; M Nowak; C Zöllner; W Lauer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  Distinguishing states of awareness from confidence during retrieval: evidence from amnesia.

Authors:  Suparna Rajaram; Maryellen Hamilton; Anthony Bolton
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Not all repetition is alike: different benefits of repetition in amnesia and normal memory.

Authors:  Mieke Verfaellie; Suparna Rajaram; Karen Fossum; Lisa Williams
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.892

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.