Literature DB >> 8750122

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol/alfentanil infusions for sedation in ICU patients.

C Frenkel1, J Schuttler, H Ihmsen, H Heye, K Rommelsheim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Population pharmacokinetic analysis and pharmacodynamic profile of propofol/alfentanil infusions for sedation and analgesia of intensive care unit patients for up to 24 h.
DESIGN: Institutional Review Board-approved prospective clinical trial.
SETTING: The ten-bed intensive care unit of an university hospital. PATIENTS: 18 consecutive patients (ten men/eight women; age: 17-73 years, mean 51.6 +/- 16.7 years, SD; body weight: 60-110 kg, mean 82.9 +/- 11.2 kg, SD) requiring mechanical ventilation and prolonged sedation/analgesia after major surgery or trauma.
INTERVENTIONS: Plasma propofol and alfentanil concentrations were measured at regular intervals during the long-term drug infusion using a high-performance liquid chromatography (propofol) and radioimmunoassay (alfentanil) analysis. The depth of sedation was controlled by monitoring a two-lead online EEG. Thus, drug application was computer controlled via a closed-loop EEG median-frequency feedback system.
RESULTS: ICU long-term infusion population pharmacokinetics (open three-compartment model) revealed for propofol: central compartment distribution volume (V1): 31.2 +/- 5.3 l; steady-state distribution volume (Vdss): 499 +/- 173 l; total clearance (Cltot): 1001- +/- 150 ml/min; redistribution half-life (t1/2 gamma): 90 +/- 23 min; elimination half-life (t1/2 beta): 558 +/- 218 minutes. For alfentanil: V1: 31.9 +/- 10.1 l; Vdss: 124 +/- 41 l; Cltot: 345 +/- 70 ml/min; t1/2 gamma: 36 +/- 15 min; t1/2 beta: 275 +/- 94 min, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The population pharmacokinetic analysis of propofol/alfentanil for ICU sedation therapy revealed increased volumes of drug distribution and decreased elimination characteristics as compared to pharmacokinetic data from short-term infusions in surgical patients. This can be attributed in part to altered distribution/redistribution processes and/or drug elimination under the condition of ICU therapy. No significant drug accumulation was observed. For future long-term sedation and analgesia of ICU patients with propofol/alfentanil, this altered pharmacokinetic behaviour should be taken into consideration to allow a more individualized and safer dosing of this drug combination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8750122     DOI: 10.1007/bf01700659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  25 in total

Review 1.  Assisted ventilation. 3. General care of the ventilated patient in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  M R Hamilton-Farrell; G C Hanson
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Estimation of population characteristics of pharmacokinetic parameters from routine clinical data.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; B Rosenberg; V V Marathe
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1977-10

3.  Population pharmacokinetics of alfentanil: the average dose-plasma concentration relationship and interindividual variability in patients.

Authors:  P O Maitre; S Vozeh; J Heykants; D A Thomson; D R Stanski
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Pharmacokinetics of alfentanil administered at a variable rate during three types of surgery.

Authors:  A G Burm; M E Ausems; J Spierdijk; D R Stanski
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Accumulation of midazolam after repeated dosage in patients receiving mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit.

Authors:  C M Byatt; L D Lewis; S Dawling; G M Cochrane
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-09-29

6.  Pharmacokinetics of long-term propofol infusion used for sedation in ICU patients.

Authors:  J Albanese; C Martin; B Lacarelle; P Saux; A Durand; F Gouin
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Propofol sedation after open heart surgery. A clinical and pharmacokinetic study.

Authors:  T J McMurray; P S Collier; I W Carson; S M Lyons; P Elliott
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 6.955

8.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol infusions during general anesthesia.

Authors:  A Shafer; V A Doze; S L Shafer; P F White
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Prolonged sedation with propofol in ICU patients: recovery and blood concentration changes during periodic interruptions in infusion.

Authors:  J P Beller; T Pottecher; A Lugnier; P Mangin; J C Otteni
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  Use of sedating drugs and neuromuscular blocking agents in patients requiring mechanical ventilation for respiratory failure. A national survey.

Authors:  J H Hansen-Flaschen; S Brazinsky; C Basile; P N Lanken
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-11-27       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  6 in total

1.  Assessing circadian rhythms in propofol PK and PD during prolonged infusion in ICU patients.

Authors:  Agnieszka Bienert; Krzysztof Kusza; Katarzyna Wawrzyniak; Edmund Grześkowiak; Zenon J Kokot; Jan Matysiak; Tomasz Grabowski; Anna Wolc; Paweł Wiczling; Miłosz Regulski
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetics of drugs used in critically ill adults.

Authors:  B M Power; A M Forbes; P V van Heerden; K F Ilett
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of medications used for moderate sedation.

Authors:  Tong J Gan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Propofol: a review of its use in intensive care sedation of adults.

Authors:  Kate McKeage; Caroline M Perry
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.749

5.  Sedation Effects Produced by a Ciprofol Initial Infusion or Bolus Dose Followed by Continuous Maintenance Infusion in Healthy Subjects: A Phase 1 Trial.

Authors:  Chao Hu; Xiaofeng Ou; Yi Teng; Shiqing Shu; Ying Wang; Xiaohong Zhu; Yan Kang; Jia Miao
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 6.  Electrophysiologic monitoring in acute brain injury.

Authors:  Jan Claassen; Paul Vespa
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.210

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.