Literature DB >> 8749755

Predicting quality-of-life outcomes following total joint arthroplasty. Limitations of the SF-36 Health Status Questionnaire.

F X McGuigan1, W J Hozack, L Moriarty, K Eng, R H Rothman.   

Abstract

A group of 114 patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty were evaluated to assess the effect of total joint arthroplasty on quality of life, as measured by the SF-36 Health Status Questionnaire, and to determine the predictive relationship between preoperative and postoperative scores. A highly significant improvement was seen comparing preoperative with postoperative scores at 2 years for physical function, social function, physical role function, emotional role function, mental health, energy, and pain. Despite a significant change in health status (P < or = .001), no change was seen in the patient's health perception (P = .61). Regression analysis failed to indicate a predictive relationship between preoperative and postoperative scores for any scale. Total joint arthroplasty dramatically improves the quality of life and function of patients afflicted with arthritis; however, because of the poor ability of the SF-36 to predict postoperative improvement on an individual basis, it cannot be used alone to determine treatment selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8749755     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(05)80069-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  29 in total

1.  Health ratings in relation to illnesses, physical functioning, general mental health and well-being: self-reports of college alumnae, ages <40-80 and older.

Authors:  Grace Wyshak
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Health status after hip or knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  C Jinks; M Lewis; P Croft
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  [Total hip replacement using the Staffelstein score: outcome of inpatient rehabilitation].

Authors:  R M Aliyev
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Clinical assessment after total hip arthroplasty using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip-Disease Evaluation Questionnaire.

Authors:  Kiyokazu Fukui; Ayumi Kaneuji; Tanzo Sugimori; Toru Ichiseki; Tadami Matsumoto; Yoshimitsu Hiejima
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-02-21

5.  Disability and mental health of patients waiting for total hip replacement.

Authors:  H C Brownlow; S Benjamin; J G Andrew; P Kay
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Total hip replacement: indications for surgery and risk factors for failure.

Authors:  R W Crawford; D W Murray
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Can Preoperative Patient-reported Outcome Measures Be Used to Predict Meaningful Improvement in Function After TKA?

Authors:  Jonathan L Berliner; Dane J Brodke; Vanessa Chan; Nelson F SooHoo; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Patient relevant outcome 7 years after total hip replacement for OA - a prospective study.

Authors:  Anna-K Nilsdotter; Fredrik Isaksson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Quality of life evaluation in patients affected by osteoarthritis secondary to congenital hip dysplasia after total hip replacement.

Authors:  Alessandra Tellini; Vincenza Ciccone; Davide Blonna; Roberto Rossi; Antongiulio Marmotti; Filippo Castoldi
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2008-08-16

10.  Satisfaction with care after total hip or knee replacement predicts self-perceived health status after surgery.

Authors:  Cédric Baumann; Anne Christine Rat; Georges Osnowycz; Didier Mainard; Christian Cuny; Francis Guillemin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.