Literature DB >> 8748183

Characterization of reactive versus tumor-bearing lymph nodes with interstitial magnetic resonance lymphography in an animal model.

P Vassallo1, C Matei, W D Heston, S J McLachlan, J A Koutcher, R A Castellino.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: To determine if magnetic resonance lymphography performed with subcutaneously administered AMI-227, a nanoparticulate iron oxide contrast agent, can distinguish reactive from tumor-bearing lymph nodes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mature male Copenhagen rats were inoculated with cell suspensions of R3327-MAT-LyLu rat prostate carcinoma (n = 21) or Freund's complete adjuvant (n = 15) in the left footpad to generate ipsilateral popliteal lymph node metastases or lymphadenitis. At 12 to 14 days after inoculation, T1-and T2-weighted magnetic resonance images of bilateral popliteal areas were obtained before and 24 hours after subcutaneous administration of AMI-227. Contrast-to-noise ratios were calculated in precontrast and postcontrast images. Bilateral popliteal nodes were excised for pathologic assessment.
RESULTS: AMI-227 resulted in decreased contrast-to-noise ratios in reactive (T1-W = -7.01 +/- 1.13, T2- W = -31.64 +/- 5.35) and normal (T1 - W = -13.56 +/- 1.97, T2 - W = -21.62 +/- 2.51) nodes. Contrast-to-noise ratios were unchanged (T1 - W = -0.22 +/- 1.71, T2 - W = -2.20 +/- 4.19) in tumor-containing nodes. These differences in contrast-to-noise ratio changes between tumor-bearing versus nontumor-bearing nodes were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Histologic analysis showed similar distribution of AMI-227 within normal and reactive nodes, but not in tumor-bearing nodes.
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in AMI-227-uptake between tumor- and nontumor-bearing nodes detected with magnetic resonance imaging are helpful for distinguishing the two entities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8748183     DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199512000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  7 in total

1.  Gadofluorine 8: initial experience with a new contrast medium for interstitial MR lymphography.

Authors:  B Misselwitz; J Platzek; B Radüchel; J J Oellinger; H J Weinmann
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance molecular imaging with nanoparticles.

Authors:  Gregory M Lanza; Patrick M Winter; Shelton D Caruthers; Anne M Morawski; Anne H Schmieder; Katherine C Crowder; Samuel A Wickline
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Macromolecules, dendrimers, and nanomaterials in magnetic resonance imaging: the interplay between size, function, and pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Aaron Joseph L Villaraza; Ambika Bumb; Martin W Brechbiel
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 4.  Animal models and molecular imaging tools to investigate lymph node metastases.

Authors:  Elliot L Servais; Christos Colovos; Adam J Bograd; Julie White; Michel Sadelain; Prasad S Adusumilli
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 5.  Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of lymph nodes in cancer patients.

Authors:  Seung Hong Choi; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  USPIO-enhanced MRI for preoperative staging of gynecological pelvic tumors: preliminary results.

Authors:  Thomas M Keller; Sven C A Michel; Johannes Fröhlich; Daniel Fink; Rosmarie Caduff; Borut Marincek; Rahel A Kubik-Huch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-02-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervix.

Authors:  Khashayar Rafat Zand; Caroline Reinhold; Hisashi Abe; Sharad Maheshwari; Ahmed Mohamed; Daniel Upegui
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-05-28       Impact factor: 3.909

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.