Literature DB >> 8747811

Input/output curves to tone bursts and clicks in extratympanic and transtympanic electrocochleography.

R Schoonhoven1, M A Fabius, J J Grote.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to explore the applicability of two specific methods in extratympanic (ET) electrocochleography that have rarely been used there, but are more commonly applied in transtympanic (TT) approaches. These two methods are the use of tone burst stimulation in addition to clicks, and the analysis of amplitude input/output curves as a measure of cochlear recruitment due to a pathological spread of excitation.
DESIGN: Simultaneous extratympanic and transtympanic recordings were made in 30 patients with various types and degrees of cochlear hearing loss. ET recordings were also made in a group of normal subjects. Stimuli were tone bursts at octave frequencies from 500 to 8000 Hz and clicks, at intensity levels of about 90 dB down to response threshold in 10 dB steps. First, a general comparison is made of ET versus TT response properties, then the initial slopes of I/O curves in both sets of data are evaluated.
RESULTS: ET responses are reduced in amplitude with respect to TT responses by a factor of 0.43 on average. Within each subject this factor is independent of stimulus type or level, but it has a substantial intersubject variation. ET and TT latencies are identical. From the normal data a criterion for abnormality of the slope of the I/O curve is derived in a similar way as available for TT data. Using this criterion ET I/O curves appear to be significantly steeper than normal in recruiting ears, albeit with a lesser sensitivity than for the associated TT data.
CONCLUSIONS: Extratympanically recorded responses to tone burst stimuli provide basically the same information as transtympanic recordings. However, for a reliable interpretation of responses to low-intensity stimuli a larger amount of signal averaging is required. The analysis of I/O curves is a useful extension of current ET methods as a contribution to assessing a pathological spread of excitation in the cochlea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8747811     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199512000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  7 in total

1.  Postoperative Electrocochleography from Hybrid Cochlear Implant users: An Alternative Analysis Procedure.

Authors:  Jeong-Seo Kim; Viral D Tejani; Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Cochlear microphonic potential recorded by transtympanic electrocochleography in normally-hearing and hearing-impaired ears.

Authors:  R Santarelli; P Scimemi; E Dal Monte; E Arslan
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.124

3.  Firing Rate Adaptation of the Human Auditory Nerve Optimizes Neural Signal-to-Noise Ratios.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Juan Dominguez
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-03-07

Review 4.  Ups and Downs in 75 Years of Electrocochleography.

Authors:  Jos J Eggermont
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-24

Review 5.  Objective Detection of Tinnitus Based on Electrophysiology.

Authors:  Shuwen Fan; Shufeng Li
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-08-16

6.  Intraoperative round window recordings to acoustic stimuli from cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Baishakhi Choudhury; Douglas C Fitzpatrick; Craig A Buchman; Benjamin P Wei; Margaret T Dillon; Shuman He; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  In Vivo Electrocochleography in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users Implicates TMPRSS3 in Spiral Ganglion Function.

Authors:  A Eliot Shearer; Viral D Tejani; Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz; Richard J H Smith
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.