Literature DB >> 8746435

A review of perinatal autopsy rates worldwide, 1960s to 1990s.

T Y Khong1.   

Abstract

Epidemiological data derived from death certification in the absence of a necropsy can be erroneous. Despite concern over adult hospital necropsy rates, which have fallen dramatically in the last 40 years, relatively less has been published regarding perinatal necropsy rates. A literature review of necropsy rates for neonatal deaths, stillbirths and perinatal losses was undertaken. There is a wide variation in the perinatal necropsy rates worldwide but the numbers appear to be higher than adult hospital rates. The necropsy rate for neonatal deaths appears to be lower than that for stillbirths. It is hoped that the review will serve to alert readers to remain vigilant against any fall in the perinatal necropsy rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8746435     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1996.tb00030.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol        ISSN: 0269-5022            Impact factor:   3.980


  5 in total

1.  Falling neonatal autopsy rates.

Authors:  T Yee Khong
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-30

2.  Perinatal and infant autopsy.

Authors:  R Adappa; S Paranjothy; Z Roberts; P H T Cartlidge
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  Parental decision making around perinatal autopsy: a qualitative investigation.

Authors:  Sarah Meaney; Stephen Gallagher; Jennifer E Lutomski; Keelin O'Donoghue
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  An international internet survey of the experiences of 1,714 mothers with a late stillbirth: the STARS cohort study.

Authors:  Jane Warland; Louise M O'Brien; Alexander E P Heazell; Edwin A Mitchell
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 5.  Dutch guideline for clinical foetal-neonatal and paediatric post-mortem radiology, including a review of literature.

Authors:  L J P Sonnemans; M E M Vester; E E M Kolsteren; J J H M Erwich; P G J Nikkels; P A M Kint; R R van Rijn; W M Klein
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.183

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.