Literature DB >> 8746105

From targets to genes: a brief history of radiosensitivity.

G G Steel1.   

Abstract

The biological work of Douglas Lea spanned the period from 1934 to his early death in 1947, and during this short period he made important contributions to the theory of radiation action. He interpreted experimental data relating to the effects of radiation on viruses, bacteria, bean roots, etc in terms of the inactivation of discrete targets, which he identified with cellular genes. He thus laid the foundation of much subsequent research. It is now well recognized that mammalian cells differ substantially in radiosensitivity, especially in the low-dose region of the survival curve. The dependence of radiosensitivity on dose rate has been widely studied; this has practical significance for clinical radiotherapy as well as mechanistic implications. Since Lea's time there have been a number of efforts to describe models that can relate cell killing to radiation dose, dose rate, and track structure. So far these have not led to a comprehensive and widely accepted picture. Microdosimetric considerations lead to the concept of differing severity of lesions induced in DNA. Much is known about the sequence of processes that subsequently lead to cell inactivation: this can be divided into phases of induction, processing, and manifestation. Chromosomal events are currently attracting much attention, as they did in Lea's time. Considerable progress has also been made in identifying genes that control the repair of radiation damage. It has been found that mutation is frequently associated with the loss of a large segment of the genome around the damage site and this will have important implications for interactive processes between particle tracks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8746105     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/41/2/001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  10 in total

1.  Inverse radiation dose-rate effects on somatic and germ-line mutations and DNA damage rates.

Authors:  M M Vilenchik; A G Knudson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Double-strand breaks and the concept of short- and long-term epigenetic memory.

Authors:  Christian Orlowski; Li-Jeen Mah; Raja S Vasireddy; Assam El-Osta; Tom C Karagiannis
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Radiation dose-rate effects, endogenous DNA damage, and signaling resonance.

Authors:  Michael M Vilenchik; Alfred G Knudson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  In vitro effects of Cyberknife-driven intermittent irradiation on glioblastoma cell lines.

Authors:  Alessandra Canazza; Ugo De Grazia; Luisa Fumagalli; Lorenzo Brait; Francesco Ghielmetti; Laura Fariselli; Danilo Croci; Andrea Salmaggi; Emilio Ciusani
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  Rationalizing Sequence and Conformational Effects on the Guanine Oxidation in Different DNA Conformations.

Authors:  Alessandro Nicola Nardi; Alessio Olivieri; Marco D'Abramo
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 6.  MicroRNAs in the ionizing radiation response and in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Chanatip Metheetrairut; Frank J Slack
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 5.578

7.  Enhancement of IUdR Radiosensitization by Low-Energy Photons Results from Increased and Persistent DNA Damage.

Authors:  Emilie Bayart; Frédéric Pouzoulet; Lucie Calmels; Jonathan Dadoun; Fabien Allot; Johann Plagnard; Jean-Luc Ravanat; André Bridier; Marc Denozière; Jean Bourhis; Eric Deutsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Histopathological assessment of protective effects of selenium nanoparticles on rat hepatocytes exposed to Gamma radiation.

Authors:  Aria Sohrabi; Ali Asghar Tehrani; Siamak Asri-Rezaei; Ahad Zeinali; Mehdi Norouzi
Journal:  Vet Res Forum       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 1.054

Review 9.  Repair of radiation damage to DNA.

Authors:  H Willers; J Dahm-Daphi; S N Powell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-04-05       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Potential use of the alkaline comet assay as a predictor of bladder tumour response to radiation.

Authors:  S R McKeown; T Robson; M E Price; E T S Ho; D G Hirst; V J McKelvey-Martin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.