Literature DB >> 8744912

Clinical evaluation of five adhesive systems: three-year results.

M J Tyas1.   

Abstract

Five dentine adhesive systems (four resin-based dentine bonding agents and one polyacid-modified composite resin) were evaluated clinically in non-undercut Class V 'abrasion' lesions. The loss rate of restorations varied from 26 per cent to 95 per cent at three years among the five systems. Products which bonded to dentine via the hybrid layer were markedly more retentive than those which were designed to bond chemically. The two products which attempted to achieve bonding between their carboxyl groups and dentinal calcium were hydrophilic, which probably contributed to their lack of success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8744912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Dent J        ISSN: 0020-6539            Impact factor:   2.512


  3 in total

1.  What type of filling? Best practice in dental restorations.

Authors:  B L Chadwick; P M Dummer; F D Dunstan; A S Gilmour; R J Jones; C J Phillips; J Rees; S Richmond; J Stevens; E T Treasure
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-09

Review 2.  Retention of tooth-colored restorations in non-carious cervical lesions--a systematic review.

Authors:  Maria Jacinta Moraes Coelho Santos; Nilgun Ari; Shawn Steele; John Costella; David Banting
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Influence of human and bovine substrate on the microleakage of two adhesive systems.

Authors:  Karoline Guará Brusaca Almeida; Kristine Guará Brusaca Almeida Scheibe; Ana Emília Figuerêdo Oliveira; Cláudia Maria Coêlho Alves; José Ferreira Costa
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.698

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.