Literature DB >> 8744883

Antihistamines and the common cold. A review and critique of the literature.

D Luks1, M R Anderson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if antihistamines provided clinically significant relief from the symptoms of the common cold.
METHODS: Structured literature review following standardized guidelines of primary studies published after 1975. MEASUREMENTS: Improvements in symptom scores for total symptoms and nasal symptoms over the first three days of a common cold.
RESULTS: Three of five studies reporting on sneezing found a statistically significant improvement in the antihistamine group; similarly, three of seven studies reporting on nasal discharge found a statistically significant improvement with therapy. No study reported improvement in total symptom score at the level of p < .05. The validity of these findings was weakened by several flaws in the literature such as inattention to clinical significance and functional impact, inappropriate use of statistical tests, and poorly described methodology. The clinical significance of these improvements was not demonstrated.
CONCLUSIONS: The primary literature offers little support for the use of antihistamines in the common cold.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8744883     DOI: 10.1007/bf02642483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  23 in total

1.  Trial of a long-acting antihistamine in the treatment of coryza.

Authors:  B W McGuinness
Journal:  Br J Clin Pract       Date:  1976-01

2.  Effectiveness of antihistamines in common cold.

Authors:  B Sakchainanont; S Ruangkanchanasetr; T Chantarojanasiri; C Tapasart; S Suwanjutha
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  1990-02

Review 3.  A review of antihistamines and the common cold.

Authors:  S West; B Brandon; P Stolley; R Rumrill
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Guidelines for reading literature reviews.

Authors:  A D Oxman; G H Guyatt
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1988-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Chemotherapy of rhinovirus colds.

Authors:  S J Sperber; F G Hayden
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  The effectiveness of antihistamines in the common cold.

Authors:  J E Crutcher; T R Kantner
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 3.126

7.  Effects of pseudoephedrine and triprolidine, alone and in combination, on symptoms of the common cold.

Authors:  C E Bye; J Cooper; D W Empey; A S Fowle; D T Hughes; E Letley; J O'Grady
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-07-19

8.  Effectiveness of antihistamines in the symptomatic management of the common cold.

Authors:  J C Howard; T R Kantner; L S Lilienfield; J V Princiotto; R E Krum; J E Crutcher; M A Belman; M R Danzig
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1979-11-30       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Over-the-counter cold medications. A critical review of clinical trials between 1950 and 1991.

Authors:  M B Smith; W Feldman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-05-05       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Ineffectiveness of oral terfenadine in natural colds: evidence against histamine as a mediator of common cold symptoms.

Authors:  M J Gaffey; D L Kaiser; F G Hayden
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.129

View more
  3 in total

1.  Common cold.

Authors:  Graham Worrall
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Influenza.

Authors:  Tom Jefferson
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.725

3.  Randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical study of the effectiveness of zinc acetate lozenges on common cold symptoms in allergy-tested subjects.

Authors:  Edward J Petrus; Kenneth A Lawson; Luke R Bucci; Kenneth Blum
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2001-10-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.