Literature DB >> 8743755

The mechanisms responsible for lack of reproducible induction of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

S A Strickberger1, E G Daoud, M J Niebauer, C Hasse, K C Man, F Morady.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is not always reproducibly inducible. The purpose of this study was to determine the mechanisms responsible for the lack of reproducible induction of AVNRT. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The induction of AVNRT was assessed with atrial burst pacing, and with atrial and ventricular programmed stimulation, each with one and two extrastimuli, in 103 patients with AVNRT. The stimulation protocol was repeated 10 times in the baseline state, during isoproterenol infusion, and after atropine administration, or until AVNRT was induced in 7 of 10 attempts. The mechanisms responsible for < 7 of 10 inductions were classified as: (1) the inability to achieve critical AH prolongation; (2) fast pathway block; and (3) slow pathway block. The induction endpoint was achieved in 90 patients: 55 in the baseline state, 34 during isoproterenol infusion, and 1 after atropine. The mechanism of noninducibility in the baseline state (n = 48) was the inability to achieve a critical AH interval in 20%, fast pathway block in 49%, and slow pathway block in 31% (P = 0.02). During isoproterenol administration (n = 14) and after atropine administration (n = 13), the three mechanisms were equally responsible for nonreproducible induction of AVNRT.
CONCLUSIONS: The induction of AVNRT is poorly reproducible in approximately 10% of patients. In the baseline state, the most common reason for the inability to reproducibly induce AVNRT is fast pathway block. In the presence of isoproterenol or atropine, each of the three mechanisms was equally responsible for noninducibility of AVNRT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8743755     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1996.tb00556.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  5 in total

1.  Determinants of immediate success for catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia in patients without junctional rhythm.

Authors:  Ataallah Bagherzadeh; Tooraj Keshavarzi; Maryam Moshkani Farahani; Hamidreza Goodarzynejad
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Differential effects of atropine and isoproterenol on inducibility of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

Authors:  C Stellbrink; B Diem; P Schauerte; K Brehmer; H Schuett; P Hanrath
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Factors of negativity of electrophysiological study in children and teenagers complaining of tachycardia and prognostic significance.

Authors:  Béatrice Brembilla-Perrot; Alice Brembilla; Anne Moulin-Zinsch; Jean Marc Sellal; Arnaud Olivier; Vladimir Manenti; Thibaut Villemin; Jean Paul Lethor; Samira Taihï; Joseph Rizk; Marc Rodermann; François Marçon; Nicolas Girerd
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  Prediction of Primary Slow-Pathway Ablation Success Rate according to the Characteristics of Junctional Rhythm Developed during the Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia.

Authors:  Ataallah Bagherzadeh; Mohammad Esmaeel Rezaee; Maryam Moshkani Farahani
Journal:  J Tehran Heart Cent       Date:  2011-02-28

5.  Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia ablation with radiofrequency energy during ongoing tachycardia: is it feasible?

Authors:  Basri Amasyali; Ayhan Kilic; Kutsi Kabul; Murat Unlu
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 1.426

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.