Literature DB >> 8743364

Laparoscopic appendectomy: comparison with open appendectomy in 720 patients.

K F Richards1, K S Fisher, J H Flores, B J Christensen.   

Abstract

We conducted a review of laparoscopic appendectomies (LA) and open appendectomies (OA) over a 3-year period, including 720 patients (253 LA, 467 OA) who underwent appendectomy during the study period. Computer records were reviewed with respect to demographics, length of stay, operating room time, operating room cost, hospital cost, and morbidity. All patients were sent surveys to assess their posthospitalization recovery. The LA patients had significant shorter hospital stays (2.06 days vs. 3.44 days, p < .001), lower morbidity rates (5 vs 14%, p < .02), and comparable overall hospital costs ($4,800 vs. $4,950). The LA patients also reported less postoperative pain and were able to return to work sooner. Our results show that LA can significantly decrease morbidity and hospital stay with a comparable hospital cost and result in quicker patient recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8743364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc        ISSN: 1051-7200


  12 in total

1.  Laparoscopic appendectomy is a favorable alternative for complicated appendicitis in children.

Authors:  Mohammad Saquib Mallick; Aayed Al-Qahtani; Abdulrahman Al-Bassam
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  The mechanical master-slave manipulator: an instrument improving the performance in standardized tasks for endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  J Diks; J E N Jaspers; W Wisselink; B A M J de Mol; C A Grimbergen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  [Laparoscopic appendectomy: is it worth the cost?].

Authors:  C Holmer; H J Buhr; J-P Ritz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy in overweight patients.

Authors:  L Enochsson; A Hellberg; C Rudberg; G Fenyö; T Gudbjartsson; E Kullman; I Ringqvist; S Sörensen; J Wenner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-02-06       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic appendectomy is associated with lower morbidity in extremely obese children.

Authors:  Balazs Kutasy; Manuela Hunziker; Ganapathy Laxamanadass; Prem Puri
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database.

Authors:  Ulrich Guller; Sheleika Hervey; Harriett Purves; Lawrence H Muhlbaier; Eric D Peterson; Steve Eubanks; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial.

Authors:  R C Ignacio; R Burke; D Spencer; C Bissell; C Dorsainvil; P A Lucha
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-12-29       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Open and laparoscopic appendectomy are equally safe and acceptable in children.

Authors:  T Oka; A G Kurkchubasche; J G Bussey; C W Wesselhoeft; T F Tracy; F I Luks
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-12-29       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic management of appendicular mass.

Authors:  Vishwanath V Shindholimath; K Thinakaran; T Narayana Rao; Yenni Veerabhadrappa Veerappa
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.407

10.  Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy with intracorporal laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy.

Authors:  T Nicholson; V Tiruchelvam
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2001 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.