Literature DB >> 8743061

Improving health care, Part 1: The clinical value compass.

E C Nelson1, J J Mohr, P B Batalden, S K Plume.   

Abstract

CLINICAL VALUE COMPASS APPROACH: The clinical Value Compass, named to reflect its similarity in layout to a directional compass, has at its four cardinal points (1) functional status, risk status, and well-being; (2) costs; (3) satisfaction with health care and perceived benefit; and (4) clinical outcomes. To manage and improve the value of health care services, providers will need to measure the value of care for similar patient populations, analyze the internal delivery processes, run tests of changed delivery processes, and determine if these changes lead to better outcomes and lower costs. GETTING STARTED--OUTCOMES AND AIM: In the case example, the team's aim is "to find ways to continually improve the quality and value of care for AMI (acute myocardial infection) patients." VALUE MEASURES--SELECT A SET OF OUTCOME AND COST MEASURES: Four to 12 outcome and cost measures are sufficient to get started. In the case example, the team chose 1 or more measures for each quadrant of the value compass. OPERATIONAL DEFINITION OF MEASURES: An operational definition is a clearly specified method explaining how to measure a variable. Measures in the case example were based on information from the medical record, administrative and financial records, and patient reports and ratings at eight weeks postdischarge. COMMENTS: Measurement systems that quantify the quality of processes and results of care are often add-ons to routine care delivery. However, the process of measurement should be intertwined with the process of care delivery so that front-line providers are involved in both managing the patient and measuring the process and related outcomes and costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8743061     DOI: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30228-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv        ISSN: 1070-3241


  24 in total

1.  The recovery vision as a service improvement guide for community mental health center providers.

Authors:  W C Torrey; P Wyzik
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2000-04

2.  PathworX: an informatics tool for quality improvement.

Authors:  J Ozbolt; G Brennan; I Hatcher
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

3.  Framework for assessing quality of care for inflammatory bowel disease in Sweden.

Authors:  Martin Rejler; Jörgen Tholstrup; Mattias Elg; Anna Spångéus; Boel Andersson Gäre
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Directory assistance for telephone care: a toll-free way to improve the quality of communication between patients, providers, and investigators.

Authors:  J H Wasson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Quality Improvement in Athletic Health Care.

Authors:  Andrea D Lopes Sauers; Eric L Sauers; Alison R Snyder Valier
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  The SPORT value compass: do the extra costs of undergoing spine surgery produce better health benefits?

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Anna N A Tosteson; Tor D Tosteson; Jon D Lurie; William A Abdu; Sohail K Mirza; Wenyan Zhao; Tamara S Morgan; Eugene C Nelson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Improving the quality of palliative care for ambulatory patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  Christian von Plessen; Aslak Aslaksen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-04

8.  A Person-Centered, Registry-Based Learning Health System for Palliative Care: A Path to Coproducing Better Outcomes, Experience, Value, and Science.

Authors:  Arif H Kamal; Kathryn B Kirkland; Diane E Meier; Tamara S Morgan; Eugene C Nelson; Steven Z Pantilat
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.947

9.  Inclusion of dynamic clinical data improves the predictive performance of a 30-day readmission risk model in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  David J Taber; Arun P Palanisamy; Titte R Srinivas; Mulugeta Gebregziabher; John Odeghe; Kenneth D Chavin; Leonard E Egede; Prabhakar K Baliga
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Relationships between fatigue and early postoperative recovery outcomes over time in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  Susan Barnason; Lani Zimmerman; Janet Nieveen; Paula Schulz; Connie Miller; Melody Hertzog; Doris Rasmussen
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.210

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.