| Literature DB >> 8743055 |
S Vogel1, J H Contois, S C Couch, C J Lammi-Keefe.
Abstract
Ultracentrifugation (UC) is the method most often employed for separation and quantification of lipoproteins. Because this procedure requires expensive laboratory equipment, a large volume of fresh sample and an inordinate amount of time, it may not be ideal for routine clinical/experimental use. The aim of the current study was to evaluate a method which combines selective precipitation (HDL-P) and immunoseparation (LDL-I) for the rapid and reliable isolation of high density lipoproteins (HDL) and low density lipoproteins (LDL) specifically for vitamin E and carotenoid determination within these fractions. Cholesterol and triacylgylcerol concentrations within the HDL and LDL were also determined to enable expression of vitamin E and carotenoid concentrations per gram of lipid. Isolation of lipoproteins by UC was used as the reference method (HDL-UC/LDL-UC). There were no significant differences between methods for alpha- and gamma-tocopherol in LDL and HDL. Carotenoids measured in HDL and LDL were comparable between the methods. The exception was higher lutein/zeaxanthin concentration in HDL-P and LDL-I compared to HDL-UC and LDL-UC, respectively. Additionally, lycopene concentration was significantly lower in LDL-I compared to LDL-UC. In comparing vitamin E and carotenoid values in lipoproteins separated from fresh and frozen plasma by the direct method, there was no difference in alpha-tocopherol or the majority of carotenoids measured. In conclusion, a combination of selective precipitation and immunoseparation of fresh or frozen plasma for subsequent alpha- and gamma-tocopherol analyses provides an accurate and reliable alternative to lipoprotein separation by UC. Additionally, carotenoid concentrations in HDL separated by selective precipitation and analyses of alpha- and beta-carotenes and beta-cryptoxanthin in LDL separated by immunoseparation are also reliable, while lycopene and lutein/zeaxanthin concentrations in LDL-I are not readily comparable to LDL-UC.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1996 PMID: 8743055 DOI: 10.1007/bf02522929
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids ISSN: 0024-4201 Impact factor: 1.880